(Im)mobilizing surveillance: Transportation in human trafficking policy

Human trafficking is a federal crime and a criminal offense in every state. In the 2010s, policymakers began to enlist transportation agencies and businesses in surveillance efforts designed to identify cases of human trafficking. We provide the first documentation and comparative analysis of state government policies and actions in the transportation domain ostensibly aimed to stem human trafficking. Our work deploys critical frameworks from sociology, geography, and feminist theory to anti-trafficking efforts in the transportation sector. By making these connections, we conclude that anti-trafficking measures that heighten surveillance of transportation systems are ill advised. We discuss how such measures invite intrusions on transportation users and their privacy, particularly on mass transit. For any passengeer presumed to be a potential victim or perpetrator, ensuing privacy intrusions carry the threat of harassment, criminalization, detention, and even deportation. These intrusions and their attendant threats — even if unrealized — erode the very mobility that transportation systems are meant to offer their passengers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544251382859
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Im)mobilizing surveillance: Transportation in human trafficking policy

Shayna Goldsmith, Gian-Claudia Sciara
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Sex work and related issues
article

(Im)mobilizing surveillance: Transportation in human trafficking policy

Shayna Goldsmith, Gian-Claudia Sciara
article en

Abstract

Human trafficking is a federal crime and a criminal offense in every state. In the 2010s, policymakers began to enlist transportation agencies and businesses in surveillance efforts designed to identify cases of human trafficking. We provide the first documentation and comparative analysis of state government policies and actions in the transportation domain ostensibly aimed to stem human trafficking. Our work deploys critical frameworks from sociology, geography, and feminist theory to anti-trafficking efforts in the transportation sector. By making these connections, we conclude that anti-trafficking measures that heighten surveillance of transportation systems are ill advised. We discuss how such measures invite intrusions on transportation users and their privacy, particularly on mass transit. For any passengeer presumed to be a potential victim or perpetrator, ensuing privacy intrusions carry the threat of harassment, criminalization, detention, and even deportation. These intrusions and their attendant threats — even if unrealized — erode the very mobility that transportation systems are meant to offer their passengers.

Environment and Planning C Politics and SpaceVol. 44(2)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.