Collective autonomy of small-scale farmers and the shared responsibility of transitions to fairer and more just food systems

Small-scale farmers provide essential contributions to society through reciprocal connections to the land and knowledge of sustainable food production, local ecologies, and communities, yet face significant unfair and unjust conditions in existing unsustainable and industrial food systems. Asking 1) How do small-scale farmers lived experiences influence their participation in societal transitions to sustainable food systems and contributions to social and ecological resilience? and 2) How can societal transitions to sustainable food systems be fair and just for small-scale farmers?, we investigated the lived experiences of 24 small-scale farmers across 16 local and ecologically sustainable farms in South-East Queensland and Northern Rivers New South Wales regions of Australia. Demonstrating a largely collective narrative aligning with the growing ‘new peasantry’ movement, these lived experiences reflect participants' environmental and social values, challenges and opportunities, and contributions to the social-ecological resilience to communities. Viewed through the lens of collective autonomy, this research explores how farmers' values, sense of autonomy and empowerment influence their motivations to farm, ability to contribute to social and ecological resilience, cope with challenges, risks and responsibilities, and visions for fairer and more just food systems that value food, land, people and community. Based upon the significant challenges, risks and responsibilities these farmers face, there is need for greater shared responsibility that re-perceives autonomy and participation between individuals, communities, organizations, and governments. These re-perceptions of autonomy and participation via shared responsibility are explored through collective paradigm shifts, Community-Supported Agriculture and Universal Basic Income. • Small-scale farmers provide essential contributions to society but still face unfair and unjust conditions. • We argue that societal transitions to sustainable food systems need to be fairer and more just for small-scale farmers. • We investigate the lived experiences of 24 Australian small-scale farmers and their visions of sustainable food systems. • Collective autonomy explores how these farmers values and sense of autonomy influences their motivations and risks. • Greater shared responsibility is needed via collective paradigm shifts, community-supported agriculture and universal basic income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103901
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective autonomy of small-scale farmers and the shared responsibility of transitions to fairer and more just food systems

Georgette Leah Burns, Kimberley Reis, Ingrid Burkett, Grace O’Connor et al.
1 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
article

Collective autonomy of small-scale farmers and the shared responsibility of transitions to fairer and more just food systems

Georgette Leah Burns, Kimberley Reis, Ingrid Burkett, Grace O’Connor, Cheryl Desha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Small-scale farmers provide essential contributions to society through reciprocal connections to the land and knowledge of sustainable food production, local ecologies, and communities, yet face significant unfair and unjust conditions in existing unsustainable and industrial food systems. Asking 1) How do small-scale farmers lived experiences influence their participation in societal transitions to sustainable food systems and contributions to social and ecological resilience? and 2) How can societal transitions to sustainable food systems be fair and just for small-scale farmers?, we investigated the lived experiences of 24 small-scale farmers across 16 local and ecologically sustainable farms in South-East Queensland and Northern Rivers New South Wales regions of Australia. Demonstrating a largely collective narrative aligning with the growing ‘new peasantry’ movement, these lived experiences reflect participants' environmental and social values, challenges and opportunities, and contributions to the social-ecological resilience to communities. Viewed through the lens of collective autonomy, this research explores how farmers' values, sense of autonomy and empowerment influence their motivations to farm, ability to contribute to social and ecological resilience, cope with challenges, risks and responsibilities, and visions for fairer and more just food systems that value food, land, people and community. Based upon the significant challenges, risks and responsibilities these farmers face, there is need for greater shared responsibility that re-perceives autonomy and participation between individuals, communities, organizations, and governments. These re-perceptions of autonomy and participation via shared responsibility are explored through collective paradigm shifts, Community-Supported Agriculture and Universal Basic Income. • Small-scale farmers provide essential contributions to society but still face unfair and unjust conditions. • We argue that societal transitions to sustainable food systems need to be fairer and more just for small-scale farmers. • We investigate the lived experiences of 24 Australian small-scale farmers and their visions of sustainable food systems. • Collective autonomy explores how these farmers values and sense of autonomy influences their motivations and risks. • Greater shared responsibility is needed via collective paradigm shifts, community-supported agriculture and universal basic income.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 121
Griffith University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.