Strategies and Considerations for Forming and Managing Community Advisory Boards from Health Research with Transgender and Nonbinary Communities

Purpose: There is limited research on the use of community advisory boards (CABs) in health research with transgender and nonbinary communities. Transgender communities are navigating challenging histories of health researcher exploitation and research distrust alongside exponential research growth. We explored strategies for forming and managing CABs when conducting transgender community-informed health research. Methods: We used purposive and snowball sampling to identify key informants (KIs): research leaders, implementing staff, and community partners engaging in transgender health research. Between October 2018 and December 2020, we conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews. We used coding followed byiterative thematic analysis and memoing to identify themes. Results: KIs emphasized the importance of involving CABs early in the research process and communicating transparently about their decision-making power and roles. They urged research teams to anticipate and address both multilevel (e.g., gender affirmation-related and socioeconomic) and historical (e.g., local research harms) barriers to CAB participation, and to intentionally engage groups that are historically underrepresented in research. KIs warned against tokenistic CAB models and called on researchers to show up for transgender communities beyond research goals. Research-related trainings and skills-building opportunities could equip CAB members to contribute meaningfully to research decisions, but KIs find that they are often under-planned and under-budgeted. Health Equity Implications: This study contributes to our understanding of how to engage and support CABs working on transgender health research, and how sociostructural factors shape their experiences. We offer a series of recommendations and questions researchers should consider when forming CABs for transgender health research and community-informed research broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Equity
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24731242251371568
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies and Considerations for Forming and Managing Community Advisory Boards from Health Research with Transgender and Nonbinary Communities

Molly Gribbin, Anthony Black, Jennifer L. Glick, Danielle German et al.
Health Equity
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Strategies and Considerations for Forming and Managing Community Advisory Boards from Health Research with Transgender and Nonbinary Communities

Molly Gribbin, Anthony Black, Jennifer L. Glick, Danielle German, Mannat Malik, Colin Flynn, Anushka Aqil, Kellan Baker, Jean-Michel Brevelle, Arjee Restar
article en

Abstract

Purpose: There is limited research on the use of community advisory boards (CABs) in health research with transgender and nonbinary communities. Transgender communities are navigating challenging histories of health researcher exploitation and research distrust alongside exponential research growth. We explored strategies for forming and managing CABs when conducting transgender community-informed health research. Methods: We used purposive and snowball sampling to identify key informants (KIs): research leaders, implementing staff, and community partners engaging in transgender health research. Between October 2018 and December 2020, we conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews. We used coding followed byiterative thematic analysis and memoing to identify themes. Results: KIs emphasized the importance of involving CABs early in the research process and communicating transparently about their decision-making power and roles. They urged research teams to anticipate and address both multilevel (e.g., gender affirmation-related and socioeconomic) and historical (e.g., local research harms) barriers to CAB participation, and to intentionally engage groups that are historically underrepresented in research. KIs warned against tokenistic CAB models and called on researchers to show up for transgender communities beyond research goals. Research-related trainings and skills-building opportunities could equip CAB members to contribute meaningfully to research decisions, but KIs find that they are often under-planned and under-budgeted. Health Equity Implications: This study contributes to our understanding of how to engage and support CABs working on transgender health research, and how sociostructural factors shape their experiences. We offer a series of recommendations and questions researchers should consider when forming CABs for transgender health research and community-informed research broadly.

Health EquityVol. 9(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Maryland Department of Health (US), Yale University (US), Whitman-Walker Health (US), Baltimore City Health Department (US), North Carolina Division of Public Health (US), Department of Health (ZA), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US), Eastern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.