Effect of Fascial Distortion Model versus Kinetic Chain Activation Technique in young adults with trapezitis: A randomized clinical trial

Introduction Trapezitis is a musculoskeletal condition involving inflammation of the trapezius muscle and myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), leading to pain and restricted cervical mobility. Fascial Distortion Model (FDM) and Kinetic Chain Activation Technique (KCAT) are emerging manual therapies targeting these dysfunctions. This study aimed to compare their effects on pain pressure threshold (PPT), pain intensity, and cervical range of motion (ROM) in young adults with trapezitis. Methods A RCT was conducted on 54 participants aged 18–26 years with trapezitis. Participants were randomly assigned to Group A (FDM) or Group B (KCAT), each receiving their respective interventions along with conventional therapy. PPT was measured using a pressure Algometer, pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and cervical ROM with a universal goniometer. Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results Both groups showed significant improvement ( p < 0.001). Group A (FDM) demonstrated a greater reduction in pain with a mean increase in Pain Pressure Threshold of 1.98 (95% CI: 1.65–2.31) and a decrease in pain intensity by 2.47 (95% CI: 2.12–2.82). Group B (KCAT) showed greater improvement in cervical mobility, flexion 13.41° (95% CI: 12.37–14.45), extension 14.33° (95% CI: 13.11–15.55), lateral flexion 10.63° (95% CI: 9.35–11.91), and rotation 22.48° (95% CI: 20.45–24.51). Between-group comparisons favored FDM for pain outcomes (PPT p = 0.031; VAS p = 0.003) and KCAT for mobility outcomes (flexion p = 0.022; rotation p = 0.006). Conclusion FDM is more effective for pain relief, while KCAT better improves cervical mobility. Both are effective in managing trapezitis however, as this was a single-session intervention and the study was not statistically powered, the long-term effects and generalizability of the findings remain uncertain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22130683251383297
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Fascial Distortion Model versus Kinetic Chain Activation Technique in young adults with trapezitis: A randomized clinical trial

Santosh Metgud, Kanad Anil Dandgavhal
1 citations
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
1.15
article

Effect of Fascial Distortion Model versus Kinetic Chain Activation Technique in young adults with trapezitis: A randomized clinical trial

Santosh Metgud, Kanad Anil Dandgavhal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Trapezitis is a musculoskeletal condition involving inflammation of the trapezius muscle and myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), leading to pain and restricted cervical mobility. Fascial Distortion Model (FDM) and Kinetic Chain Activation Technique (KCAT) are emerging manual therapies targeting these dysfunctions. This study aimed to compare their effects on pain pressure threshold (PPT), pain intensity, and cervical range of motion (ROM) in young adults with trapezitis. Methods A RCT was conducted on 54 participants aged 18–26 years with trapezitis. Participants were randomly assigned to Group A (FDM) or Group B (KCAT), each receiving their respective interventions along with conventional therapy. PPT was measured using a pressure Algometer, pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and cervical ROM with a universal goniometer. Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results Both groups showed significant improvement ( p < 0.001). Group A (FDM) demonstrated a greater reduction in pain with a mean increase in Pain Pressure Threshold of 1.98 (95% CI: 1.65–2.31) and a decrease in pain intensity by 2.47 (95% CI: 2.12–2.82). Group B (KCAT) showed greater improvement in cervical mobility, flexion 13.41° (95% CI: 12.37–14.45), extension 14.33° (95% CI: 13.11–15.55), lateral flexion 10.63° (95% CI: 9.35–11.91), and rotation 22.48° (95% CI: 20.45–24.51). Between-group comparisons favored FDM for pain outcomes (PPT p = 0.031; VAS p = 0.003) and KCAT for mobility outcomes (flexion p = 0.022; rotation p = 0.006). Conclusion FDM is more effective for pain relief, while KCAT better improves cervical mobility. Both are effective in managing trapezitis however, as this was a single-session intervention and the study was not statistically powered, the long-term effects and generalizability of the findings remain uncertain.

Physiotherapy Practice and ResearchVol. 47(1)
Jain University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.