Symmetry versus asymmetry of rifted margins: The role of mechanical anisotropy

Abstract Continental lithosphere extension leads to necking and breakup, forming conjugate rifted margins that vary from symmetric to asymmetric morphologies. Although such differences are commonly linked to variations in initial lithospheric rheology, along-strike transitions between symmetric and asymmetric margins within single rift systems point to additional controlling factors. Structural inheritance, causing mechanical anisotropy in the continental lithosphere, is commonly suggested to influence rift evolution. Here we present novel geodynamic models of lithospheric extension incorporating inherited mechanical anisotropy using a transversely isotropic visco-plastic rheology coupled to the director vector approach. By systematically varying anisotropy strength and initial fabric orientation, we demonstrate that mechanical anisotropy alone can explain the transition from symmetric to asymmetric rifting. In our models, isotropic materials favor symmetric rifting dominated by pure shear deformation, while anisotropic materials promote asymmetric rifting driven primarily by simple shear. This transition occurs at low initial fabric angles and moderate anisotropy strengths. Our results offer a novel and robust mechanism for the formation of both symmetric and asymmetric conjugate margins and suggest that along-strike variations in structural inheritance—and thus mechanical anisotropy—can produce contrasting deformation styles within a single rift system. These findings highlight the critical role of mechanical anisotropy in shaping rifted margins and influencing the tectonic evolution of continental lithosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geology
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1130/g53383.1
Primary Topic
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symmetry versus asymmetry of rifted margins: The role of mechanical anisotropy

Julie Tugend, Geoffroy Mohn, Stefan M. Schmalholz, Thibault Duretz
Geology
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
article

Symmetry versus asymmetry of rifted margins: The role of mechanical anisotropy

Julie Tugend, Geoffroy Mohn, Stefan M. Schmalholz, Thibault Duretz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Continental lithosphere extension leads to necking and breakup, forming conjugate rifted margins that vary from symmetric to asymmetric morphologies. Although such differences are commonly linked to variations in initial lithospheric rheology, along-strike transitions between symmetric and asymmetric margins within single rift systems point to additional controlling factors. Structural inheritance, causing mechanical anisotropy in the continental lithosphere, is commonly suggested to influence rift evolution. Here we present novel geodynamic models of lithospheric extension incorporating inherited mechanical anisotropy using a transversely isotropic visco-plastic rheology coupled to the director vector approach. By systematically varying anisotropy strength and initial fabric orientation, we demonstrate that mechanical anisotropy alone can explain the transition from symmetric to asymmetric rifting. In our models, isotropic materials favor symmetric rifting dominated by pure shear deformation, while anisotropic materials promote asymmetric rifting driven primarily by simple shear. This transition occurs at low initial fabric angles and moderate anisotropy strengths. Our results offer a novel and robust mechanism for the formation of both symmetric and asymmetric conjugate margins and suggest that along-strike variations in structural inheritance—and thus mechanical anisotropy—can produce contrasting deformation styles within a single rift system. These findings highlight the critical role of mechanical anisotropy in shaping rifted margins and influencing the tectonic evolution of continental lithosphere.

GeologyVol. 54(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut des Sciences de la Terre de Paris (FR), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Université de Lausanne
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.