Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial
Alternating posture between sitting and standing with sit-stand desks may improve lower back pain (LBP). This study explored the effectiveness, acceptability and adherence of two sit-stand desk recommendations on LBP (measured via App) and secondary health and work outcomes. Fifty-six desk-based workers with LBP (age = 37.7 [SD = 10.0] years, 75 % women) were randomised to either a fixed ratio (30 min sitting:15 min standing); or a personalised ratio (self-selected or pre-emptive to discomfort). After 3 months, fixed ratio participants experienced reduced worst (-1.33 points/10) and average LBP (-0.83 points/10); personalised ratio participants experienced reduced worst LBP only (-0.69 points/10). Fixed ratio participants improved in their job-related stress, concentration and presenteeism; whereas, personalised ratio participants reduced their sitting time. Both recommendations were acceptable, while adherence was higher in the fixed ratio group. In conclusion, a 30:15 sit-stand ratio was acceptable and effective at improving LBP in the short term compared to a personalised ratio.
Authors
- Trevor Russell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-6167)
- Venerina Johnston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0911-0866)
- Sjaan R. Gomersall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6808-0180)
- Michelle Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7860-1581)
- Charlotte L. Brakenridge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4540-7659)
- Nicole Andrews (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7739-1738)
Institutions
- Griffith University (AU)
- Queensland Health (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Southern Queensland (AU)
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU)
- Metro South Health (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Applied Ergonomics
- Published
- 2025-10-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104670
- Primary Topic
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00