Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial

Alternating posture between sitting and standing with sit-stand desks may improve lower back pain (LBP). This study explored the effectiveness, acceptability and adherence of two sit-stand desk recommendations on LBP (measured via App) and secondary health and work outcomes. Fifty-six desk-based workers with LBP (age = 37.7 [SD = 10.0] years, 75 % women) were randomised to either a fixed ratio (30 min sitting:15 min standing); or a personalised ratio (self-selected or pre-emptive to discomfort). After 3 months, fixed ratio participants experienced reduced worst (-1.33 points/10) and average LBP (-0.83 points/10); personalised ratio participants experienced reduced worst LBP only (-0.69 points/10). Fixed ratio participants improved in their job-related stress, concentration and presenteeism; whereas, personalised ratio participants reduced their sitting time. Both recommendations were acceptable, while adherence was higher in the fixed ratio group. In conclusion, a 30:15 sit-stand ratio was acceptable and effective at improving LBP in the short term compared to a personalised ratio.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ergonomics
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104670
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial

Trevor Russell, Venerina Johnston, Sjaan R. Gomersall, Michelle Smith et al.
Applied Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial

Trevor Russell, Venerina Johnston, Sjaan R. Gomersall, Michelle Smith, Charlotte L. Brakenridge, Nicole Andrews
article en

Abstract

Alternating posture between sitting and standing with sit-stand desks may improve lower back pain (LBP). This study explored the effectiveness, acceptability and adherence of two sit-stand desk recommendations on LBP (measured via App) and secondary health and work outcomes. Fifty-six desk-based workers with LBP (age = 37.7 [SD = 10.0] years, 75 % women) were randomised to either a fixed ratio (30 min sitting:15 min standing); or a personalised ratio (self-selected or pre-emptive to discomfort). After 3 months, fixed ratio participants experienced reduced worst (-1.33 points/10) and average LBP (-0.83 points/10); personalised ratio participants experienced reduced worst LBP only (-0.69 points/10). Fixed ratio participants improved in their job-related stress, concentration and presenteeism; whereas, personalised ratio participants reduced their sitting time. Both recommendations were acceptable, while adherence was higher in the fixed ratio group. In conclusion, a 30:15 sit-stand ratio was acceptable and effective at improving LBP in the short term compared to a personalised ratio.

Applied ErgonomicsVol. 131
Griffith University (AU), Queensland Health (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Metro South Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial — Trevor Russell, Venerina Johnston, et al. · Applied Ergonomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS