Pathways for Ukraine’s post-war nature recovery: Focus on forest socio-ecological systems

Natural ecosystems face significant pressure from climate change, biodiversity loss, and increasing socio-economic and political stressors-all of which are exacerbated by military conflict. This paper focuses on Ukraine and examines the root causes of disturbances in the country's forest socio-ecological systems (SES), as well as the impacts of the ongoing war, to identify recovery pathways. Using a multi-method approach, we assess factors affecting Ukraine's forest SES and identify three key recovery pathways: (1) an economic focus through forest use for low-carbon recovery, including timber for reconstruction and small-scale energy production; (2) a "close-to-nature and close-to-people" approach, leveraging digital tools and innovations for climate-resilient recovery; and (3) anticipatory governance and socio-ecological innovation. Relying on a single pathway risks long-term vulnerability. We highlight that integrating recovery pathways creates synergies. Coordinated actions within Ukraine and from international actors are essential to enable a recovery aligned with "build back better" principles. Our findings offer valuable insights for Ukraine and other conflict-affected regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02263-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways for Ukraine’s post-war nature recovery: Focus on forest socio-ecological systems

William S. Keeton, Yevhenii Khan, Ihor Soloviy, Ganna Lobchenko et al.
1 citations
AMBIO
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
2.42
article

Pathways for Ukraine’s post-war nature recovery: Focus on forest socio-ecological systems

William S. Keeton, Yevhenii Khan, Ihor Soloviy, Ganna Lobchenko, Simo Sarkki, Christian Rosset, Bernhard Pauli, Maria Nijnik, Sergiy Zibtsev, Claude García, Patrick O. Waeber, Mariana Melnykovych, Oleksandr Soshenskyi, Pavlo Kravets, Roman Yaroshchuk, Natalia Voloshyna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Natural ecosystems face significant pressure from climate change, biodiversity loss, and increasing socio-economic and political stressors-all of which are exacerbated by military conflict. This paper focuses on Ukraine and examines the root causes of disturbances in the country's forest socio-ecological systems (SES), as well as the impacts of the ongoing war, to identify recovery pathways. Using a multi-method approach, we assess factors affecting Ukraine's forest SES and identify three key recovery pathways: (1) an economic focus through forest use for low-carbon recovery, including timber for reconstruction and small-scale energy production; (2) a "close-to-nature and close-to-people" approach, leveraging digital tools and innovations for climate-resilient recovery; and (3) anticipatory governance and socio-ecological innovation. Relying on a single pathway risks long-term vulnerability. We highlight that integrating recovery pathways creates synergies. Coordinated actions within Ukraine and from international actors are essential to enable a recovery aligned with "build back better" principles. Our findings offer valuable insights for Ukraine and other conflict-affected regions.

AMBIOVol. 55(4)
University of Vermont (US), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), James Hutton Institute (GB), Sumy National Agrarian University (UA), University of Erfurt (DE), Ukrainian National Forestry University (UA), National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Government of Ukraine (UA), Swiss Federal University for Vocational Education and Training SFUVET (CH), Kyiv City Clinical Oncology Center (UA), Schneeberger (Switzerland) (CH), FORZA, Agency For Sustainable Development of The Carpathian Region (UA), Oldham Council (GB), University of Oulu (FI)
UK Research and Innovation, European Commission, Berner Fachhochschule, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.