Postpartum Intrauterine Device Removal and Access to Removal in the 18 Months Following an Intervention in Tanzania, Sri Lanka, and Nepal

Family planning programs in the Global South promote long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), but research suggests that women face barriers to LARC discontinuation, inhibiting their reproductive autonomy. Scholars have called for improved data visibility around LARC removal access. We use data from the Postpartum Intrauterine Device (PPIUD) Study, a randomized trial of a PPIUD intervention conducted in Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania from 2015 to 2018. Among women who adopted PPIUDs, we describe PPIUD status (in-use, expelled, deliberately removed) at three follow-up points. We report the proportion of participants who sought PPIUD removal and, among those, whether they faced barriers to removal. About three-quarters of 5370 participants had their PPIUD in use 18 months following insertion; one-fifth had their PPIUD deliberately removed, and 6 percent had their PPIUD expelled. Of the 22 percent of participants who sought PPIUD removal, a quarter faced a barrier to removal; most barriers were provider-imposed. In conjunction with existing literature, our findings highlight that barriers to LARC removal are structural, rooted in larger public health and demographic goals that aim to promote contraceptive uptake. We call for safeguards to ensure that people who desire LARC removal can discontinue their method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Family Planning
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70038
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postpartum Intrauterine Device Removal and Access to Removal in the 18 Months Following an Intervention in Tanzania, Sri Lanka, and Nepal

Leigh Senderowicz, Joanna Maselko, Katherine Tumlinson, Bruce Bullington et al.
Studies in Family Planning
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Postpartum Intrauterine Device Removal and Access to Removal in the 18 Months Following an Intervention in Tanzania, Sri Lanka, and Nepal

Leigh Senderowicz, Joanna Maselko, Katherine Tumlinson, Bruce Bullington, Audrey E. Pettifor, Jessie K. Edwards, Kavita Shah Arora
article en

Abstract

Family planning programs in the Global South promote long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), but research suggests that women face barriers to LARC discontinuation, inhibiting their reproductive autonomy. Scholars have called for improved data visibility around LARC removal access. We use data from the Postpartum Intrauterine Device (PPIUD) Study, a randomized trial of a PPIUD intervention conducted in Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania from 2015 to 2018. Among women who adopted PPIUDs, we describe PPIUD status (in-use, expelled, deliberately removed) at three follow-up points. We report the proportion of participants who sought PPIUD removal and, among those, whether they faced barriers to removal. About three-quarters of 5370 participants had their PPIUD in use 18 months following insertion; one-fifth had their PPIUD deliberately removed, and 6 percent had their PPIUD expelled. Of the 22 percent of participants who sought PPIUD removal, a quarter faced a barrier to removal; most barriers were provider-imposed. In conjunction with existing literature, our findings highlight that barriers to LARC removal are structural, rooted in larger public health and demographic goals that aim to promote contraceptive uptake. We call for safeguards to ensure that people who desire LARC removal can discontinue their method.

Studies in Family PlanningVol. 57(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
National Institutes of Health, Langley Research Center, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.