Are loneliness interventions effective for reducing loneliness? A meta-analytic review of 280 studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Psychologist
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001578
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are loneliness interventions effective for reducing loneliness? A meta-analytic review of 280 studies.

Claus Løvschall, Emely Ek Blæhr, Pamela Qualter, Robin Christensen et al.
7 citations
American Psychologist
Health and Well-being Studies
16.15
article

Are loneliness interventions effective for reducing loneliness? A meta-analytic review of 280 studies.

Claus Løvschall, Emely Ek Blæhr, Pamela Qualter, Robin Christensen, Michelle H. Lim, Lisbeth Mølgaard Laustsen, Mathias Lasgaard, Lauren Burke, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Anne-Sofie Hargaard, J. A. Christiansen, Sigrid Engelbrecht Sjøl
article en
7 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
American PsychologistVol. 81(1)
Aarhus University (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), University of Manchester (GB), Central Denmark Region (DK), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Health and Well-being Studies
16.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are loneliness interventions effective for reducing loneliness? A meta-analytic review of 280 studies. — Claus Løvschall, Emely Ek Blæhr, et al. · American Psychologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS