Kinematics of strikes in venomous snakes

Venomous snakes owe their evolutionary success in part to the effectiveness of their strike. The success of a strike depends on reaching the prey quickly before it startles and has the chance to escape. Here, we present the first ever large-scale experiment comparing strike performance across 36 venomous snake species from three families (31 Viperidae, 4 Elapidae and 1 Colubridae). We used two high-speed video cameras (1000 frames s-1) to capture strikes at a ballistics gel prey and tracked the strike trajectory in three dimensions. The 3D coordinates were used to measure strike kinematics and performance. Kinematic performance was compared within Viperidae across predation style, diel activity pattern, diet, habitat type, temperature and first jaw contact with prey. Kinematic variables (peak velocity, peak acceleration, gape angle, start distance, contact angle, head size) varied by the part of the jaw that first contacts the prey. Start distance to prey also varied by peak acceleration, jaw gape angle and contact angle with prey. Vipers typically reached higher peak velocities than elapids; however, some elapids such as Acanthophis rugosus reached equally high velocities. Peak velocities were found to be higher in ambush predators and in snakes that prey on mammalian prey. Prey was often reached within 100 ms, which falls within the mammalian startle response. Behavioural differences across the three families were also observed: Viperidae performed a smooth strike that was often followed by fang repositioning; Elapidae reached their prey quickly, bit and repeatedly squeezed prey with their jaws; and Colubridae used their rear-positioned fangs by alternate jaw movement to damage the prey's surface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250347
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinematics of strikes in venomous snakes

David P. Hocking, Silke G. C. Cleuren, Alistair R. Evans, Anthony Herrel et al.
3 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
3.32
article

Kinematics of strikes in venomous snakes

David P. Hocking, Silke G. C. Cleuren, Alistair R. Evans, Anthony Herrel, James Rule, Rémi Ksas
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Venomous snakes owe their evolutionary success in part to the effectiveness of their strike. The success of a strike depends on reaching the prey quickly before it startles and has the chance to escape. Here, we present the first ever large-scale experiment comparing strike performance across 36 venomous snake species from three families (31 Viperidae, 4 Elapidae and 1 Colubridae). We used two high-speed video cameras (1000 frames s-1) to capture strikes at a ballistics gel prey and tracked the strike trajectory in three dimensions. The 3D coordinates were used to measure strike kinematics and performance. Kinematic performance was compared within Viperidae across predation style, diel activity pattern, diet, habitat type, temperature and first jaw contact with prey. Kinematic variables (peak velocity, peak acceleration, gape angle, start distance, contact angle, head size) varied by the part of the jaw that first contacts the prey. Start distance to prey also varied by peak acceleration, jaw gape angle and contact angle with prey. Vipers typically reached higher peak velocities than elapids; however, some elapids such as Acanthophis rugosus reached equally high velocities. Peak velocities were found to be higher in ambush predators and in snakes that prey on mammalian prey. Prey was often reached within 100 ms, which falls within the mammalian startle response. Behavioural differences across the three families were also observed: Viperidae performed a smooth strike that was often followed by fang repositioning; Elapidae reached their prey quickly, bit and repeatedly squeezed prey with their jaws; and Colubridae used their rear-positioned fangs by alternate jaw movement to damage the prey's surface.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 228(20)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Antwerp (BE), Museums Victoria (AU), Ghent University (BE), Natural History Museum of Bern (CH), Museum of Old and New Art (AU), Innovascience (FR), Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution (FR), Monash University (AU)
Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, Ecological Society of America, Equity Trustees, Monash University, Ecological Society of Australia, State Grid Corporation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.