Impact of a Maturing Fistula or Graft on Dialysis Patient Outcomes

Background: Catheter (CVC) access is used by ~80% of patients who initiate hemodialysis (HD), but some of these patients also have a fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG) which is not yet ready for use (CVC-Plus). We evaluated patient survival after day 90 and transplant waitlisting for the CVC-Plus group, compared to patients using AVF/G and CVC-only. Methods: All adult patients enrolled in the US Renal Data System with first-time, incident HD with primary Medicare between 2014-2017 were considered, if still receiving chronic dialysis on day 90. Propensity-matched samples were constructed to balance the characteristics between patients with each type of initial vascular access, including: age, sex, race, BMI, albumin, hemoglobin, eGFR, kidney diagnosis, pre-dialysis nephrology/dietary care, and comorbid conditions. Patient survival was evaluated with Cox regression. Transplant waitlist appearance was evaluated by logistic regression. CVC-plus was the reference group for all models. Results: Among 236,775 subjects, 58% had CVC-only, 19% had CVC-Plus, and 23% had AVF/G. Median follow up was 34 (IQR: 14-50) months. Mean age was 69.6 years and 44% were female. There were 160,264 deaths (68%) during the study period. Waitlisting occurred for 15% of AVF/G, 9% of CVC-Plus, and 7% of CVC-only. Compared to CVC-Plus, CVC-only was associated with increased death (HR: 1.19, 95%CI=1.17-1.21), and AVF/G was associated with decreased death (HR: 0.86, 95%CI=0.84-0.87), p<0.001 for both. Compared to CVC-Plus, the odds of being waitlisted were higher in patients with AVF/AVG (OR: 1.56, (95%CI=1.49-1.62), and lower in patients with CVC-only (OR: 0.84, (95%CI=0.80-0.88), p<0.001 for both. Conclusion: Initiating HD with an unready AVF/G is associated with better survival and more opportunity for transplant waitlisting, compared to having CVC as sole access – but functioning AVF/G are associated with the best outcomes. These associations are robust to extensive propensity matching. Working diligently to secure vascular access is worthwhile, especially as the need for dialysis approaches.. Funding: Other NIH Support - NIDDK awards: U2CDK129917, d TL1DK132769

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025t4ew6yc0
Primary Topic
Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a Maturing Fistula or Graft on Dialysis Patient Outcomes

Ted A. Skolarus, Peter Angelos, Mary Hammes, Rita L. McGill et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
article

Impact of a Maturing Fistula or Graft on Dialysis Patient Outcomes

Ted A. Skolarus, Peter Angelos, Mary Hammes, Rita L. McGill, Aiyang Liu, Jacob Ryno
article en

Abstract

Background: Catheter (CVC) access is used by ~80% of patients who initiate hemodialysis (HD), but some of these patients also have a fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG) which is not yet ready for use (CVC-Plus). We evaluated patient survival after day 90 and transplant waitlisting for the CVC-Plus group, compared to patients using AVF/G and CVC-only. Methods: All adult patients enrolled in the US Renal Data System with first-time, incident HD with primary Medicare between 2014-2017 were considered, if still receiving chronic dialysis on day 90. Propensity-matched samples were constructed to balance the characteristics between patients with each type of initial vascular access, including: age, sex, race, BMI, albumin, hemoglobin, eGFR, kidney diagnosis, pre-dialysis nephrology/dietary care, and comorbid conditions. Patient survival was evaluated with Cox regression. Transplant waitlist appearance was evaluated by logistic regression. CVC-plus was the reference group for all models. Results: Among 236,775 subjects, 58% had CVC-only, 19% had CVC-Plus, and 23% had AVF/G. Median follow up was 34 (IQR: 14-50) months. Mean age was 69.6 years and 44% were female. There were 160,264 deaths (68%) during the study period. Waitlisting occurred for 15% of AVF/G, 9% of CVC-Plus, and 7% of CVC-only. Compared to CVC-Plus, CVC-only was associated with increased death (HR: 1.19, 95%CI=1.17-1.21), and AVF/G was associated with decreased death (HR: 0.86, 95%CI=0.84-0.87), p<0.001 for both. Compared to CVC-Plus, the odds of being waitlisted were higher in patients with AVF/AVG (OR: 1.56, (95%CI=1.49-1.62), and lower in patients with CVC-only (OR: 0.84, (95%CI=0.80-0.88), p<0.001 for both. Conclusion: Initiating HD with an unready AVF/G is associated with better survival and more opportunity for transplant waitlisting, compared to having CVC as sole access – but functioning AVF/G are associated with the best outcomes. These associations are robust to extensive propensity matching. Working diligently to secure vascular access is worthwhile, especially as the need for dialysis approaches.. Funding: Other NIH Support - NIDDK awards: U2CDK129917, d TL1DK132769

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.