Implementing the iRAPPORT Model to Improve Communication and Teaching in Nephrology Consultations: A Pilot Study

Background: Effective communication during consultations is essential for patient care and trainee education. However, variability in consult delivery can lead to unclear consult questions, missed teaching, and inefficiencies. We aimed to implement a structured model to improve consult clarity, communication and teaching during inpatient consultations. Methods: Participants included Internal Medicine residents and Nephrology fellows at Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in 2025.Verbal consults (in person or phone) were eligible. iRAPPORT was developed from literature review and informal needs assessment of house staff and faculty (figure 1). It was introduced at noon conference and displayed in housestaff workrooms. Post-intervention survey was distributed. The intervention lasted 1 month. Primary outcome was trainee perception of consult clarity and communication. Secondary outcome was perception of teaching points during consults. Results: Surveys were completed by 80% of fellows (n=4) and 20% of residents (n=7; 2 interns, 5 residents). Most agreed that iRAPPORT improved communication (73%), consult clarity (73%) and professionalism (73%). A majority (81%) planned to continue using it, and 73% found it feasible for daily use. While 75% of fellows reported increased teaching, only 28% of residents perceived increased teaching. Half of fellows and 57% of residents noted improved consult quality and initial workup. Residents valued the structure; fellows noted clearer questions and more complete workups. Barriers included interruptions, limited model awareness, and discomfort stating team roles. Conclusion: iRAPPORT was perceived as a useful tool to enhance consult clarity and communication. Its impact on teaching was mixed, possibly limited by workload. Limitations included short duration, single site, small sample, low survey response rate and no pre-survey or adherence data. Future steps include evaluating patient safety impact, broader implementation, teaching workshops and epic integrating.iRAPPORT model

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20253ychgm99
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing the iRAPPORT Model to Improve Communication and Teaching in Nephrology Consultations: A Pilot Study

Amanda K. Leonberg‐Yoo, C. Jessica Dine, Rachel Hilburg, Nadia Al Haddad
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

Implementing the iRAPPORT Model to Improve Communication and Teaching in Nephrology Consultations: A Pilot Study

Amanda K. Leonberg‐Yoo, C. Jessica Dine, Rachel Hilburg, Nadia Al Haddad
article en

Abstract

Background: Effective communication during consultations is essential for patient care and trainee education. However, variability in consult delivery can lead to unclear consult questions, missed teaching, and inefficiencies. We aimed to implement a structured model to improve consult clarity, communication and teaching during inpatient consultations. Methods: Participants included Internal Medicine residents and Nephrology fellows at Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in 2025.Verbal consults (in person or phone) were eligible. iRAPPORT was developed from literature review and informal needs assessment of house staff and faculty (figure 1). It was introduced at noon conference and displayed in housestaff workrooms. Post-intervention survey was distributed. The intervention lasted 1 month. Primary outcome was trainee perception of consult clarity and communication. Secondary outcome was perception of teaching points during consults. Results: Surveys were completed by 80% of fellows (n=4) and 20% of residents (n=7; 2 interns, 5 residents). Most agreed that iRAPPORT improved communication (73%), consult clarity (73%) and professionalism (73%). A majority (81%) planned to continue using it, and 73% found it feasible for daily use. While 75% of fellows reported increased teaching, only 28% of residents perceived increased teaching. Half of fellows and 57% of residents noted improved consult quality and initial workup. Residents valued the structure; fellows noted clearer questions and more complete workups. Barriers included interruptions, limited model awareness, and discomfort stating team roles. Conclusion: iRAPPORT was perceived as a useful tool to enhance consult clarity and communication. Its impact on teaching was mixed, possibly limited by workload. Limitations included short duration, single site, small sample, low survey response rate and no pre-survey or adherence data. Future steps include evaluating patient safety impact, broader implementation, teaching workshops and epic integrating.iRAPPORT model

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.