Immune-Related, Kidney, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma with Autoimmune Disease Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Background: Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (AID) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Current guidelines recommend caution due to concerns about exacerbated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and renal complications, yet real-world data are lacking. Methods: We identified adults with RCC who received pembrolizumab, nivolumab or ipilimumab within the TriNetX Network. Patients with systemic AID formed Cohort A, while Cohort B comprised matched controls without AID. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed for demographics, comorbidities, RCC stage, baseline renal function, and other variables. Outcomes included immune-related toxicities, renal events, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier and risk analyses were performed, excluding patients with prior outcomes. Results: After matching, 244 patients per group were analyzed, with a mean age of 65 years and 66% male. The rates of immune-related adverse outcomes were similar between cohorts, including steroid initiation (54% in AID vs 62% in controls), colitis (17.1% vs 17.6%), immune hepatitis (7.1% vs 9.5%), adrenalitis (4.2% vs 4.2%), hypothyroidism (10.4% vs 10.9%), hyperthyroidism (2.2% vs 2.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (1.2% vs 1.5%). Hypophysitis occurred more frequently in the autoimmune cohort (4.1% vs 0%), though absolute event rates were low. Renal outcomes, including AKI (36.8% vs 35.7%), dialysis (4.3% vs 4.4%), progression to advanced CKD (8.3% vs 10.6%), and elevated BUN (14.4% vs 16.8%), were also comparable between groups. clinical outcomes, such as cardiac arrest (4.2% vs 4.1%), septic shock (7.9% vs 4.2%), all-cause mortality (41.8% vs 39.8%), hospitalization (75.8% vs 79.5%), and outpatient visits (89.0% vs 93.0%), did not differ significantly between groups, all p-values being non-significant. Conclusion: In this study, RCC patients with AID receiving ICIs experienced similar rates of immune-related, renal, and clinical adverse outcomes as controls. Except for a higher rate of hypophysitis in the AID cohort, there was no increased risk of major toxicity. These findings address a critical gap in the literature and suggest that, with appropriate patient selection and monitoring, ICI therapy may be considered in RCC patients with autoimmune disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025r4ksq93b
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immune-Related, Kidney, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma with Autoimmune Disease Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Brian Singeltary, Farhan Khan, Guido M Capriles
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Immune-Related, Kidney, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma with Autoimmune Disease Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Brian Singeltary, Farhan Khan, Guido M Capriles
article en

Abstract

Background: Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (AID) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Current guidelines recommend caution due to concerns about exacerbated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and renal complications, yet real-world data are lacking. Methods: We identified adults with RCC who received pembrolizumab, nivolumab or ipilimumab within the TriNetX Network. Patients with systemic AID formed Cohort A, while Cohort B comprised matched controls without AID. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed for demographics, comorbidities, RCC stage, baseline renal function, and other variables. Outcomes included immune-related toxicities, renal events, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier and risk analyses were performed, excluding patients with prior outcomes. Results: After matching, 244 patients per group were analyzed, with a mean age of 65 years and 66% male. The rates of immune-related adverse outcomes were similar between cohorts, including steroid initiation (54% in AID vs 62% in controls), colitis (17.1% vs 17.6%), immune hepatitis (7.1% vs 9.5%), adrenalitis (4.2% vs 4.2%), hypothyroidism (10.4% vs 10.9%), hyperthyroidism (2.2% vs 2.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (1.2% vs 1.5%). Hypophysitis occurred more frequently in the autoimmune cohort (4.1% vs 0%), though absolute event rates were low. Renal outcomes, including AKI (36.8% vs 35.7%), dialysis (4.3% vs 4.4%), progression to advanced CKD (8.3% vs 10.6%), and elevated BUN (14.4% vs 16.8%), were also comparable between groups. clinical outcomes, such as cardiac arrest (4.2% vs 4.1%), septic shock (7.9% vs 4.2%), all-cause mortality (41.8% vs 39.8%), hospitalization (75.8% vs 79.5%), and outpatient visits (89.0% vs 93.0%), did not differ significantly between groups, all p-values being non-significant. Conclusion: In this study, RCC patients with AID receiving ICIs experienced similar rates of immune-related, renal, and clinical adverse outcomes as controls. Except for a higher rate of hypophysitis in the AID cohort, there was no increased risk of major toxicity. These findings address a critical gap in the literature and suggest that, with appropriate patient selection and monitoring, ICI therapy may be considered in RCC patients with autoimmune disease.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
TriHealth (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.