Dual Attention Transformer for Real-Time Prediction of Intradialytic Hypotension and Hypertension

Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN) are common hemodialysis complications, each independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. Existing predictive models often fail to capture the complex temporal dynamics of real-world hemodialysis data, underscoring the need for more advanced machine learning approaches. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,301 hemodialysis patients, comprising 177,211 dialysis sessions and 1,165,811 time-stamped data points after preprocessing. The dataset was randomly divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) subsets. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN) were defined using standard criteria: IDH-20 as a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥20 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduction of ≥10 mmHg; IDH-30 as a ≥30 mmHg systolic drop or the same MAP threshold; IDHTN-10 as a systolic increase of ≥10 mmHg; and IDHTN-20 as a ≥20 mmHg increase. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and F1 score. All patient data were anonymized to ensure privacy. Results: In the test cohort, which included 130 patients and 70,280 time-stamped data points, the incidences of IDH-20, IDH-30, IDHTN-10, and IDHTN-20 were 15.24%, 9.94%, 18.48%, and 8.03%, respectively. The Transformer model demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving AUROC values of 0.91 for IDH-20, 0.93 for IDH-30, and 0.89 for both IDHTN-10 and IDHTN-20 (all P < 0.01). Less stringent definitions, such as IDH-20 and IDHTN-10, yielded higher AUPRCs, suggesting that the model effectively captured early or moderate events without compromising classification accuracy. To complement these findings, we trained a LightGBM model using data from 1,024 patients and 63,976 dialysis sessions to predict symptoms or clinical interventions associated with IDH and IDHTN during individual dialysis sessions. This model achieved an AUC of 0.824. Conclusion: Our Transformer model with a dual attention mechanism demonstrates high accuracy in predicting intradialytic blood pressure abnormalities in real time. This approach holds promise for proactive clinical decision-making and personalized dialysis management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025a1mnwszb
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual Attention Transformer for Real-Time Prediction of Intradialytic Hypotension and Hypertension

Xilin Guan
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Dual Attention Transformer for Real-Time Prediction of Intradialytic Hypotension and Hypertension

Xilin Guan
article en

Abstract

Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN) are common hemodialysis complications, each independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. Existing predictive models often fail to capture the complex temporal dynamics of real-world hemodialysis data, underscoring the need for more advanced machine learning approaches. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,301 hemodialysis patients, comprising 177,211 dialysis sessions and 1,165,811 time-stamped data points after preprocessing. The dataset was randomly divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) subsets. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN) were defined using standard criteria: IDH-20 as a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥20 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduction of ≥10 mmHg; IDH-30 as a ≥30 mmHg systolic drop or the same MAP threshold; IDHTN-10 as a systolic increase of ≥10 mmHg; and IDHTN-20 as a ≥20 mmHg increase. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and F1 score. All patient data were anonymized to ensure privacy. Results: In the test cohort, which included 130 patients and 70,280 time-stamped data points, the incidences of IDH-20, IDH-30, IDHTN-10, and IDHTN-20 were 15.24%, 9.94%, 18.48%, and 8.03%, respectively. The Transformer model demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving AUROC values of 0.91 for IDH-20, 0.93 for IDH-30, and 0.89 for both IDHTN-10 and IDHTN-20 (all P < 0.01). Less stringent definitions, such as IDH-20 and IDHTN-10, yielded higher AUPRCs, suggesting that the model effectively captured early or moderate events without compromising classification accuracy. To complement these findings, we trained a LightGBM model using data from 1,024 patients and 63,976 dialysis sessions to predict symptoms or clinical interventions associated with IDH and IDHTN during individual dialysis sessions. This model achieved an AUC of 0.824. Conclusion: Our Transformer model with a dual attention mechanism demonstrates high accuracy in predicting intradialytic blood pressure abnormalities in real time. This approach holds promise for proactive clinical decision-making and personalized dialysis management.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.