Retention on Peritoneal Dialysis (PD): Adult Patients Transition Away from PD, a Five-Year Regional Analysis Using IPRO Data

Background: We are particularly interested in the retention of patients who initiated PD, given the 2019 Executive Order by the Department of Health and Human Services promoted home-based therapies. While the percentage of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) has gradually increased, in-center hemodialysis (HD) still dominates, accounting for 82.4% of dialysis patients. This study explores the transition of patients from PD to other modalities over a 5 year period. Methods: We analyzed data from 250,447 adult patients across the New England, New York, South Atlantic, and Ohio River regions from 2018 to 2024. Descriptive statistics used median (range) for quantitative and frequency (percentage) for qualitative variables. Results: Of the patient population, 15.3% were on PD (incident PD & PD after HD). The rate of PD retention declined sharply: only 7.8% of PD patients remained on PD after five years. Survival rate was highest in the first year (91.8%), correlating with the lowest failure rate (14.3%). As time progressed, the survival rate decreased to 48.7% in year 5, with the failure rate increasing to 68.9%. These trends were consistent across all four studied regions. Most influential factors for PD failure were patient age and urban vs rural treatment location (p< 0.0001). Conclusion: Although PD offers quality-of-life advantages over HD, its long-term adoption remains low due to significant early failure rates and other persistent barriers, such as healthcare illiteracy, appropriate home environment, and inadequate support. Further research is essential to identify and develop policies to help mitigate the multifaceted challenges preventing sustained use of PD in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025zx08qaxq
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retention on Peritoneal Dialysis (PD): Adult Patients Transition Away from PD, a Five-Year Regional Analysis Using IPRO Data

Angelika C. Gruessner, Eugene K Yeboah, Subodh J. Saggi, David C. Goodman et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Retention on Peritoneal Dialysis (PD): Adult Patients Transition Away from PD, a Five-Year Regional Analysis Using IPRO Data

Angelika C. Gruessner, Eugene K Yeboah, Subodh J. Saggi, David C. Goodman, Fida Mengal, Yadanar Lwin, Crystal Delp, Fnu Veerban, Fnu Suraj
article en

Abstract

Background: We are particularly interested in the retention of patients who initiated PD, given the 2019 Executive Order by the Department of Health and Human Services promoted home-based therapies. While the percentage of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) has gradually increased, in-center hemodialysis (HD) still dominates, accounting for 82.4% of dialysis patients. This study explores the transition of patients from PD to other modalities over a 5 year period. Methods: We analyzed data from 250,447 adult patients across the New England, New York, South Atlantic, and Ohio River regions from 2018 to 2024. Descriptive statistics used median (range) for quantitative and frequency (percentage) for qualitative variables. Results: Of the patient population, 15.3% were on PD (incident PD & PD after HD). The rate of PD retention declined sharply: only 7.8% of PD patients remained on PD after five years. Survival rate was highest in the first year (91.8%), correlating with the lowest failure rate (14.3%). As time progressed, the survival rate decreased to 48.7% in year 5, with the failure rate increasing to 68.9%. These trends were consistent across all four studied regions. Most influential factors for PD failure were patient age and urban vs rural treatment location (p< 0.0001). Conclusion: Although PD offers quality-of-life advantages over HD, its long-term adoption remains low due to significant early failure rates and other persistent barriers, such as healthcare illiteracy, appropriate home environment, and inadequate support. Further research is essential to identify and develop policies to help mitigate the multifaceted challenges preventing sustained use of PD in clinical practice.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.