The Painterly Materiality of Clouds in <i>Antony and Cleopatra</i> and <i>Hamlet</i>

Abstract This article examines the cloud‐gazing scenes in Antony and Cleopatra and Hamlet through the lens of early modern artistic theory and material practices, particularly the art of limning. Building upon existing philosophical and poetic interpretations of Shakespearean clouds as metaphors for ephemerality and memory, the essay argues that the two plays mobilize contrasting artistic vocabularies – Antony and Cleopatra through the translucent textures of watercolour limnings, and Hamlet through the heavy, ink‐like density of fretted engravings. Drawing on treatises by Nicholas Hilliard and Edward Norgate, as well as visual analyses of works by Dürer and Hilliard, the study foregrounds Shakespeare’s use of highly specific technical lexicons to render the materiality of clouds and ghosts. These “painterly” elements illuminate the plays’ broader concerns with mimesis, memory, and the instability of signs. By attending to the distinct textures and techniques evoked in each play, the article reveals how Shakespeare’s dramatic poetics intersect with contemporary visual culture, offering arresting, spectral images that suspend time and challenge the viewer’s perception of presence and representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renaissance Studies
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.70016
Primary Topic
Historical and Architectural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Painterly Materiality of Clouds in Antony and Cleopatra and Hamlet

Anne‐Valérie Dulac
Renaissance Studies
Historical and Architectural Studies
article

The Painterly Materiality of Clouds in Antony and Cleopatra and Hamlet

Anne‐Valérie Dulac
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the cloud‐gazing scenes in Antony and Cleopatra and Hamlet through the lens of early modern artistic theory and material practices, particularly the art of limning. Building upon existing philosophical and poetic interpretations of Shakespearean clouds as metaphors for ephemerality and memory, the essay argues that the two plays mobilize contrasting artistic vocabularies – Antony and Cleopatra through the translucent textures of watercolour limnings, and Hamlet through the heavy, ink‐like density of fretted engravings. Drawing on treatises by Nicholas Hilliard and Edward Norgate, as well as visual analyses of works by Dürer and Hilliard, the study foregrounds Shakespeare’s use of highly specific technical lexicons to render the materiality of clouds and ghosts. These “painterly” elements illuminate the plays’ broader concerns with mimesis, memory, and the instability of signs. By attending to the distinct textures and techniques evoked in each play, the article reveals how Shakespeare’s dramatic poetics intersect with contemporary visual culture, offering arresting, spectral images that suspend time and challenge the viewer’s perception of presence and representation.

Renaissance Studies
Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire Médiations (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Historical and Architectural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Painterly Materiality of Clouds in <i>Antony and Cleopatra</i> and <i>Hamlet</i> — Anne‐Valérie Dulac · Renaissance Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS