Prospective randomized control trial measuring posterior capsular opacification rates and visual outcomes following insertion of two monofocal intraocular lenses: the hydrophobic RayOne 800C and the hydrophilic RayOne 600C: 12-month results
Plain Language Summary Purpose: To compare posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and visual outcomes between hydrophobic (HPB) and hydrophilic (HPL) acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) with comparable haptic shapes, dimensions, and the same manufacturer. Setting: Teaching Hospital in the United Kingdom. Design: Single-centre, prospective, randomised control study. Methods: Patients with symptomatic cataract were randomised to receive either the RayOne 600C IOL (HPL group) (40 eyes, 40 patients) or the RayOne 800C IOL (HPB group) (45 eyes, 45 patients) and assessed at baseline, 1 month (1M), 6 months (6M), and 12 months (12M). Primary outcome measures were development of visually significant PCO requiring Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy, and the mean percentage area of PCO within the central 4 millimetres of the IOL as measured independently by three clinicians from retro-illuminated, digital photographs. Secondary outcomes were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), patient reported outcome measures (CATPROM-5, EQ5D3L) and adverse events. Results: At 12M, there were no statistically significant differences in UDVA, CDVA, CATPROM-5, or EQ5D3L scores between the HPL and HPB groups. There were no patients requiring Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy for significant PCO in either group in the first 12 months after surgery. There were no differences in percentage areas of PCO between the HPL and HPB groups at 1M (2.05% vs 2.53%; p=0.18), 6M (1.92% vs 2.49%; p=0.22), and at 12M (3.64% vs 3.83%; p=0.86). Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in PCO or post-operative visual outcomes between a hydrophilic acrylic and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL with comparable designs. Plain Language SummaryThis study compared two types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) used in cataract surgery: hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic lenses, both from the same manufacturer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either type and were monitored for a year. The main focus was on posterior capsular opacification (PCO), a common post-surgery complication, and visual outcomes. Results showed no significant differences in PCO development or visual acuity between the two lens types over 12 months. Neither group required laser treatment for PCO, and both had similar patient-reported outcomes. This suggests both lens types are equally effective in preventing PCO and maintaining visual quality. Text is machine generated and may contain inaccuracies. FAQ
Authors
- Elodie Azan
- David O’Brart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1065-3166)
- Scott Robbie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-5677)
- Khayam Naderi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-296X)
- Ashmal Jameel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-4609)
- Sancy Low (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-5971)
- Chun Fung Jeffrey Lam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7408-7846)
- Nick Stanojcic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-5836)
- C.C. Hull (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-4443)
- Ailsa Ritchie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2495-7571)
- Samantha Mann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-4501)
- Vijay Wagh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9491-5863)
- Christopher Joseph Hammond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3227-2620)
- Moin Mohamed
- Mani Bhogal
Institutions
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- City, University of London (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Lambeth Hospital (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2025-10-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001814
- Primary Topic
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00