Effects of Screening Colonoscopy: Evidence From Observational and Interventional Studies

Following a landmark report from the National Polyp Study published in 1993, which suggested that colonoscopic polypectomy can prevent most colorectal cancers (CRCs), screening colonoscopy was widely recommended and used in the United States and a few other countries for CRC prevention. Since then, age-adjusted CRC incidence and mortality have declined by approximately one third in the screening age population in the United States, in contrast to an alarming increase in incidence at younger ages. Furthermore, a number of observational studies, including large-scale cohort studies, have consistently confirmed screening colonoscopy to be associated with strongly reduced CRC incidence and mortality. However, results from randomized trials aimed to assess long-term effects on CRC incidence and mortality have become available only very recently, and they seemed to be less conclusive. In this review article, we review the evidence from observational and interventional studies, paying particular attention to the role of specific design features and potential sources of bias. We conclude that, despite apparent differences in reported results, both observational and interventional studies provide compelling evidence for strong preventive effects of screening colonoscopy. On the population level, similarly strong incidence and mortality reduction might be reached by well-organized screening programs achieving higher adherence rates with less invasive screening tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003814
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Screening Colonoscopy: Evidence From Observational and Interventional Studies

Thomas Heisser, Michael Hoffmeister, Д. В. Сергеев, Hermann Brenner
1 citations
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Effects of Screening Colonoscopy: Evidence From Observational and Interventional Studies

Thomas Heisser, Michael Hoffmeister, Д. В. Сергеев, Hermann Brenner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Following a landmark report from the National Polyp Study published in 1993, which suggested that colonoscopic polypectomy can prevent most colorectal cancers (CRCs), screening colonoscopy was widely recommended and used in the United States and a few other countries for CRC prevention. Since then, age-adjusted CRC incidence and mortality have declined by approximately one third in the screening age population in the United States, in contrast to an alarming increase in incidence at younger ages. Furthermore, a number of observational studies, including large-scale cohort studies, have consistently confirmed screening colonoscopy to be associated with strongly reduced CRC incidence and mortality. However, results from randomized trials aimed to assess long-term effects on CRC incidence and mortality have become available only very recently, and they seemed to be less conclusive. In this review article, we review the evidence from observational and interventional studies, paying particular attention to the role of specific design features and potential sources of bias. We conclude that, despite apparent differences in reported results, both observational and interventional studies provide compelling evidence for strong preventive effects of screening colonoscopy. On the population level, similarly strong incidence and mortality reduction might be reached by well-organized screening programs achieving higher adherence rates with less invasive screening tests.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 121(3)
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.