Estimating the Value of Including Resilience in a Multi‐Trait Selection Index Designed for Australian Merino Sheep

General resilience in livestock can be estimated from the variability in longitudinal data and may support balanced breeding objectives by helping animals better cope with environmental stress. However, its economic value and inclusion within multi-trait selection indexes remain largely unexplored. Current genetic improvement programs for sheep primarily focus on wool growth, reproduction and lean meat production. This study developed a bioeconomic model to estimate the economic value of general resilience, using the natural logarithm of variance of wool fibre diameter as a resilience indicator trait in sheep. A commercial Merino sheep enterprise was considered, and the economic value of resilience was derived from its association with health, mortality, and energy allocation for production. The breeding objective included key traits related to meat production, reproduction, and wool quality and quantity, to compare the economic impact of resilience with these traits. Among 13 traits, resilience contributed 2.02% to the total value of the index and ranked 11th in economic importance. After 10 years of simulated selection, resilience was expected to improved by 0.07 genetic standard deviations, translating to a modest economic gain of $0.08 per ewe. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impacts of increasing the relative contribution of resilience within the index on selection responses under four scenarios: (i) base genetic correlations, (ii) stronger correlations, (iii) weaker correlations, and (iv) adding genomic information. Resilience responded 50%-75% more effectively to selection when it had stronger genetic correlations with production traits or when genomic information was incorporated. However, placing greater emphasis on resilience (> 10% of the index) reduced progress in key production traits. Future research should explore these trade-offs in industry selection indexes to integrate resilience effectively without compromising productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.70021
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Value of Including Resilience in a Multi‐Trait Selection Index Designed for Australian Merino Sheep

Samuel F. Walkom, Sam Clark, Erin G. Smith
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Estimating the Value of Including Resilience in a Multi‐Trait Selection Index Designed for Australian Merino Sheep

Samuel F. Walkom, Sam Clark, Erin G. Smith
article en

Abstract

General resilience in livestock can be estimated from the variability in longitudinal data and may support balanced breeding objectives by helping animals better cope with environmental stress. However, its economic value and inclusion within multi-trait selection indexes remain largely unexplored. Current genetic improvement programs for sheep primarily focus on wool growth, reproduction and lean meat production. This study developed a bioeconomic model to estimate the economic value of general resilience, using the natural logarithm of variance of wool fibre diameter as a resilience indicator trait in sheep. A commercial Merino sheep enterprise was considered, and the economic value of resilience was derived from its association with health, mortality, and energy allocation for production. The breeding objective included key traits related to meat production, reproduction, and wool quality and quantity, to compare the economic impact of resilience with these traits. Among 13 traits, resilience contributed 2.02% to the total value of the index and ranked 11th in economic importance. After 10 years of simulated selection, resilience was expected to improved by 0.07 genetic standard deviations, translating to a modest economic gain of $0.08 per ewe. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impacts of increasing the relative contribution of resilience within the index on selection responses under four scenarios: (i) base genetic correlations, (ii) stronger correlations, (iii) weaker correlations, and (iv) adding genomic information. Resilience responded 50%-75% more effectively to selection when it had stronger genetic correlations with production traits or when genomic information was incorporated. However, placing greater emphasis on resilience (> 10% of the index) reduced progress in key production traits. Future research should explore these trade-offs in industry selection indexes to integrate resilience effectively without compromising productivity.

Journal of Animal Breeding and GeneticsVol. 143(2)
University of New England (AU)
Australian Wool Innovation, McMaster University, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.