Incentivizing Changes in Principal Preparation: Lessons from North Carolina Principal Fellows Policy

This case study examined the perspectives of educational leadership faculty regarding the Principal Fellows legislation and its influences on the principal preparation landscape in North Carolina. This qualitative inquiry drew from semi-structured interviews with principal preparation program faculty and coordinators. Relatedly, documents relevant to the Principal Fellows legislation and its implementation were collected to confirm and clarify, enabling triangulation in this study. Data analysis proceeded inductively, allowing insights to emerge from the data free from theoretical influences. Four key themes reflected how participants perceived the influences of the policy on preparation programs: (a) centering attention to high-need schools, (b) incentivizing the adoption of evidence-based practices, (c) expanding programs’ capacity through funding, and (d) learning from other programs. The paper concludes with recommendations for policymakers to consider as they seek to improve the quality of principal preparation programs across their states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Policy
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048251382159
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentivizing Changes in Principal Preparation: Lessons from North Carolina Principal Fellows Policy

Mario Jackson
Educational Policy
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Incentivizing Changes in Principal Preparation: Lessons from North Carolina Principal Fellows Policy

Mario Jackson
article en

Abstract

This case study examined the perspectives of educational leadership faculty regarding the Principal Fellows legislation and its influences on the principal preparation landscape in North Carolina. This qualitative inquiry drew from semi-structured interviews with principal preparation program faculty and coordinators. Relatedly, documents relevant to the Principal Fellows legislation and its implementation were collected to confirm and clarify, enabling triangulation in this study. Data analysis proceeded inductively, allowing insights to emerge from the data free from theoretical influences. Four key themes reflected how participants perceived the influences of the policy on preparation programs: (a) centering attention to high-need schools, (b) incentivizing the adoption of evidence-based practices, (c) expanding programs’ capacity through funding, and (d) learning from other programs. The paper concludes with recommendations for policymakers to consider as they seek to improve the quality of principal preparation programs across their states.

Educational Policy
Florida State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incentivizing Changes in Principal Preparation: Lessons from North Carolina Principal Fellows Policy — Mario Jackson · Educational Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS