London Dispersion versus Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond in Bis‐Pyridines: How Accurate Is DFT for Competing Noncovalent Interactions in the Condensed Phase?

We report a systematic investigation of noncovalent interactions-particularly an intramolecular hydrogen bond and London Dispersion forces-in singly protonated bis-pyridines, studied across solution and crystalline states. Building on our previous gas-phase study, we combine variable-temperature <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The measured <sup>1</sup>H NMR chemical shifts of the acidic proton serve as a solution-phase structural readout, which we correlate with an independent crystallographic metric. By systematically varying the linker (-CH<sub>2</sub>-, -O-, and -CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>-) and the pendant substituents (H, methyl, tert-butyl), we examine how increasingly bulky "dispersion energy donors" affect both the intramolecular hydrogen bond and the accessible conformational states. In reference systems, where a single noncovalent interaction governs the geometry, even relatively simple computational models correctly reproduce the experimentally observed structures. However, for molecules featuring two competing noncovalent interactions, the tested, dispersion-corrected, DFT often fails to predict the relative energies of accessible conformers accurately, highlighting current limitations in predictive accuracy. We briefly discuss broader implications of currently achievable predictive accuracy for homogeneous catalysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry - A European Journal
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202502745
Primary Topic
Crystallography and molecular interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

London Dispersion versus Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond in Bis‐Pyridines: How Accurate Is DFT for Competing Noncovalent Interactions in the Condensed Phase?

Vladimir Gorbachev, Charlotte N. Stindt, Peter Chen, Adélaïde Savoy
Chemistry - A European Journal
Crystallography and molecular interactions
article

London Dispersion versus Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond in Bis‐Pyridines: How Accurate Is DFT for Competing Noncovalent Interactions in the Condensed Phase?

Vladimir Gorbachev, Charlotte N. Stindt, Peter Chen, Adélaïde Savoy
article en

Abstract

We report a systematic investigation of noncovalent interactions-particularly an intramolecular hydrogen bond and London Dispersion forces-in singly protonated bis-pyridines, studied across solution and crystalline states. Building on our previous gas-phase study, we combine variable-temperature <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The measured <sup>1</sup>H NMR chemical shifts of the acidic proton serve as a solution-phase structural readout, which we correlate with an independent crystallographic metric. By systematically varying the linker (-CH<sub>2</sub>-, -O-, and -CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>-) and the pendant substituents (H, methyl, tert-butyl), we examine how increasingly bulky "dispersion energy donors" affect both the intramolecular hydrogen bond and the accessible conformational states. In reference systems, where a single noncovalent interaction governs the geometry, even relatively simple computational models correctly reproduce the experimentally observed structures. However, for molecules featuring two competing noncovalent interactions, the tested, dispersion-corrected, DFT often fails to predict the relative energies of accessible conformers accurately, highlighting current limitations in predictive accuracy. We briefly discuss broader implications of currently achievable predictive accuracy for homogeneous catalysis.

Chemistry - A European JournalVol. 31(66)
ETH Zurich (CH)
National Science Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Branco Weiss Fellowship – Society in Science, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Crystallography and molecular interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.