Cortical excitability and analgesic effects of multisite transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the motor cortex and cerebellum in fibromyalgia

This double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial investigated whether a single session of anodal-(a) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), cerebellum (CB), or both, would reduce pain and increase corticospinal excitability more effectively than sham stimulation (s-tDCS). Ninety-two women with fibromyalgia were randomized to a single session of anodal-(a)-tDCS or sham-(s)-tDCS. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, assessed with the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), and corticospinal excitability, measured by motor evoked potentials (MEP). Compared to sham, a-tDCS significantly reduced NPS scores (Wald χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.02, df = 1, p < 0.01; d = 0.55, 95% CI 0.08-0.92) and increased MEP amplitude (Wald χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.37, df = 1, p < 0.01; d = 0.48, 95% CI 0.07-0.89). Post-hoc and interaction analyses indicated that these effects were primarily attributable to M1 stimulation, rather than cerebellar or combined protocols. Anodal tDCS also reduced multidimensional pain interference, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and reduced the cortical silent period (CSP) in a BDNF-dependent manner. These findings provide mechanistic insights rather than clinical efficacy, showing that a single M1 a-tDCS session-compared to sham, cerebellar, or combined protocols-more effectively reduced pain intensity and interference and modulated cortical excitability in a BDNF-dependent manner.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05963321. URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05963321 (Date of registration 27/07/2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20769-1
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cortical excitability and analgesic effects of multisite transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the motor cortex and cerebellum in fibromyalgia

Maria da Graça Lopes Tarragó, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Hugo Bock, C. Venturini et al.
Scientific Reports
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Cortical excitability and analgesic effects of multisite transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the motor cortex and cerebellum in fibromyalgia

Maria da Graça Lopes Tarragó, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Hugo Bock, C. Venturini, Daniel Fernando Arias Betancur, Miguel Coelho, Wolnei Caumo, João Paulo Gomes, Felipe Fregni, Graziele Borges Bueno, Bárbara Regina França
article en

Abstract

This double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial investigated whether a single session of anodal-(a) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), cerebellum (CB), or both, would reduce pain and increase corticospinal excitability more effectively than sham stimulation (s-tDCS). Ninety-two women with fibromyalgia were randomized to a single session of anodal-(a)-tDCS or sham-(s)-tDCS. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, assessed with the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), and corticospinal excitability, measured by motor evoked potentials (MEP). Compared to sham, a-tDCS significantly reduced NPS scores (Wald χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.02, df = 1, p < 0.01; d = 0.55, 95% CI 0.08-0.92) and increased MEP amplitude (Wald χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.37, df = 1, p < 0.01; d = 0.48, 95% CI 0.07-0.89). Post-hoc and interaction analyses indicated that these effects were primarily attributable to M1 stimulation, rather than cerebellar or combined protocols. Anodal tDCS also reduced multidimensional pain interference, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and reduced the cortical silent period (CSP) in a BDNF-dependent manner. These findings provide mechanistic insights rather than clinical efficacy, showing that a single M1 a-tDCS session-compared to sham, cerebellar, or combined protocols-more effectively reduced pain intensity and interference and modulated cortical excitability in a BDNF-dependent manner.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05963321. URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05963321 (Date of registration 27/07/2023).

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Hospital de Clínicas (UY)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Fundação Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.