Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regression Under Output Perturbation

ABSTRACT The increased application of machine learning (ML) in sensitive domains requires protecting the training data through privacy frameworks, such as differential privacy (DP). Traditional DP enforces a uniform privacy level , which bounds the maximum privacy loss that each data point in the dataset is allowed to incur. However, this one‐size‐fits‐all approach fails to reflect the reality that individuals often have different privacy expectations‐depending on factors such as the sensitivity of their data, legal requirements, or personal risk tolerance. As a result, uniform DP can either overprotect some data (hurting utility) or underprotect others (violating privacy needs). In this work, we introduce our Personalized‐DP Output Perturbation method (PDP‐OP) that enables us to train Ridge regression models with individual per data point privacy levels, in the central privacy model. Our method relies on a technique known as output perturbation, that was introduced by Chaudhuri and Monteleoni, augmented with re‐weighting data points according to their privacy levels. Additionally, we provide rigorous privacy proofs and accuracy guarantees for PDP‐OP. Thereby, our work distinguishes itself by providing theoretical accuracy guarantees in personalized DP settings in ML, whereas similar previous work only provided empirical evaluations. To demonstrate how our theoretical bounds hold in practice, we evaluate PDP‐OP on synthetic and real datasets and with diverse privacy distributions. We show that by enabling each data point to specify their own privacy requirement, we can significantly improve the privacy‐accuracy trade‐offs compared to non‐personalized DP. Finally, we also show that PDP‐OP outperforms the personalized privacy techniques introduced by Jorgensen et al. that rely on subsampling as opposed to reweighting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.70016
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regression Under Output Perturbation

Juba Ziani, Franziska Boenisch, Rakshit Naidu, Krishna Prasad Acharya
Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regression Under Output Perturbation

Juba Ziani, Franziska Boenisch, Rakshit Naidu, Krishna Prasad Acharya
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The increased application of machine learning (ML) in sensitive domains requires protecting the training data through privacy frameworks, such as differential privacy (DP). Traditional DP enforces a uniform privacy level , which bounds the maximum privacy loss that each data point in the dataset is allowed to incur. However, this one‐size‐fits‐all approach fails to reflect the reality that individuals often have different privacy expectations‐depending on factors such as the sensitivity of their data, legal requirements, or personal risk tolerance. As a result, uniform DP can either overprotect some data (hurting utility) or underprotect others (violating privacy needs). In this work, we introduce our Personalized‐DP Output Perturbation method (PDP‐OP) that enables us to train Ridge regression models with individual per data point privacy levels, in the central privacy model. Our method relies on a technique known as output perturbation, that was introduced by Chaudhuri and Monteleoni, augmented with re‐weighting data points according to their privacy levels. Additionally, we provide rigorous privacy proofs and accuracy guarantees for PDP‐OP. Thereby, our work distinguishes itself by providing theoretical accuracy guarantees in personalized DP settings in ML, whereas similar previous work only provided empirical evaluations. To demonstrate how our theoretical bounds hold in practice, we evaluate PDP‐OP on synthetic and real datasets and with diverse privacy distributions. We show that by enabling each data point to specify their own privacy requirement, we can significantly improve the privacy‐accuracy trade‐offs compared to non‐personalized DP. Finally, we also show that PDP‐OP outperforms the personalized privacy techniques introduced by Jorgensen et al. that rely on subsampling as opposed to reweighting.

Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Helmholtz Center for Information Security (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.