Network Approaches to Binary Assessment Data: Network Psychometrics Versus Latent Space Item Response Models

This study compares two network-based approaches for analyzing binary psychological assessment data: network psychometrics and latent space item response modeling (LSIRM). Network psychometrics, a well-established method, infers relationships among items or symptoms based on pairwise conditional dependencies. In contrast, LSIRM is a more recent framework that represents item responses as a bipartite network of respondents and items embedded in a latent metric space, where the likelihood of a response decreases with increasing distance between the respondent and item. We evaluate the performance of both methods through simulation studies under varying data-generating conditions. In addition, we demonstrate their applications to real assessment data, showcasing the distinct insights each method offers to researchers and practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644251371187
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network Approaches to Binary Assessment Data: Network Psychometrics Versus Latent Space Item Response Models

Ludovica De Carolis, Minjeong Jeon
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Network Approaches to Binary Assessment Data: Network Psychometrics Versus Latent Space Item Response Models

Ludovica De Carolis, Minjeong Jeon
article en

Abstract

This study compares two network-based approaches for analyzing binary psychological assessment data: network psychometrics and latent space item response modeling (LSIRM). Network psychometrics, a well-established method, infers relationships among items or symptoms based on pairwise conditional dependencies. In contrast, LSIRM is a more recent framework that represents item responses as a bipartite network of respondents and items embedded in a latent metric space, where the likelihood of a response decreases with increasing distance between the respondent and item. We evaluate the performance of both methods through simulation studies under varying data-generating conditions. In addition, we demonstrate their applications to real assessment data, showcasing the distinct insights each method offers to researchers and practitioners.

Educational and Psychological MeasurementVol. 86(2)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Network Approaches to Binary Assessment Data: Network Psychometrics Versus Latent Space Item Response Models — Ludovica De Carolis, Minjeong Jeon · Educational and Psychological Measurement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS