Experimental and simulation assessment of gamma-radiation shielding properties of the polyester polymer reinforced with WO3

In this study, the shielding features of six samples of the polyester (PE)/WO<sub>3</sub> polymer composite against gamma rays (<sup>137</sup>Cs, <sup>22</sup>Na, <sup>60</sup>Co, and <sup>133</sup>Ba sources) were evaluated via an experimental setup in the laboratory, using GEANT4 and MCNP Monte Carlo codes, as well as Phy-X/PSD and XCOM online programs. To study the structure of the composites, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were conducted. Moreover, parameters such as the linear attenuation coefficient (LAC), mass attenuation coefficient (MAC), half-value layer (HVL), tenth-value layer (TVL), mean free path (MFP), effective atomic number (Z<sub>eff</sub>), and effective electron density (N<sub>eff</sub>) were calculated and compared for the six samples. The values of the MAC parameter for the six samples (W0, W1, W2, W3, W4, and W5) and for the experimental measurements are 0.0712 ± 0.003, 0.0714 ± 0.001, 0.0764 ± 0.002, 0.0791 ± 0.004, 0.0796 ± 0.006, and 0.0823 ± 0.003 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (662 keV), 0.0887 ± 0.002, 0.0889 ± 0.005, 0.0893 ± 0.007, 0.0902 ± 0.003, 0.0913 ± 0.008, and 0.0938 ± 0.002 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (511 keV),0.0577 ± 0.004, 0.0576 ± 0.006, 0.0568 ± 0.009, 0.0561 ± 0.002, 0.0560 ± 0.005, and 0.0551 ± 0.002 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (1.275 MeV),0.0615 ± 0.006, 0.0614 ± 0.008, 0.0605 ± 0.008, 0.0601 ± 0.002, 0.0596 ± 0.001, and 0.0593 ± 0.008 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (1.173 MeV),0.0581 ± 0.002, 0.0579 ± 0.003, 0.0572 ± 0.003, 0.0568 ± 0.003, 0.0565 ± 0.005, and 0.0560 ± 0.001 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (1.332 MeV), and 0.1012 ± 0.002, 0.1015 ± 0.001, 0.1035 ± 0.001, 0.1066 ± 0.005, 0.1099 ± 0.008, and 0.1201 ± 0.007 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (356 keV), respectively. According to the results, the W5 samples can be selected as the most effective shielding material among the samples. In addition, the experimental data and the simulated values obtained from the four mentioned programs were in good agreement, indicating that the Monte Carlo codes and online programs are reliable tools for studying nuclear reactions with high accuracy while also saving time and costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21003-8
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and simulation assessment of gamma-radiation shielding properties of the polyester polymer reinforced with WO3

Akbar Abdi Saray, Farzad Isazadeh
6 citations
Scientific Reports
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
3.11
article

Experimental and simulation assessment of gamma-radiation shielding properties of the polyester polymer reinforced with WO3

Akbar Abdi Saray, Farzad Isazadeh
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In this study, the shielding features of six samples of the polyester (PE)/WO<sub>3</sub> polymer composite against gamma rays (<sup>137</sup>Cs, <sup>22</sup>Na, <sup>60</sup>Co, and <sup>133</sup>Ba sources) were evaluated via an experimental setup in the laboratory, using GEANT4 and MCNP Monte Carlo codes, as well as Phy-X/PSD and XCOM online programs. To study the structure of the composites, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were conducted. Moreover, parameters such as the linear attenuation coefficient (LAC), mass attenuation coefficient (MAC), half-value layer (HVL), tenth-value layer (TVL), mean free path (MFP), effective atomic number (Z<sub>eff</sub>), and effective electron density (N<sub>eff</sub>) were calculated and compared for the six samples. The values of the MAC parameter for the six samples (W0, W1, W2, W3, W4, and W5) and for the experimental measurements are 0.0712 ± 0.003, 0.0714 ± 0.001, 0.0764 ± 0.002, 0.0791 ± 0.004, 0.0796 ± 0.006, and 0.0823 ± 0.003 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (662 keV), 0.0887 ± 0.002, 0.0889 ± 0.005, 0.0893 ± 0.007, 0.0902 ± 0.003, 0.0913 ± 0.008, and 0.0938 ± 0.002 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (511 keV),0.0577 ± 0.004, 0.0576 ± 0.006, 0.0568 ± 0.009, 0.0561 ± 0.002, 0.0560 ± 0.005, and 0.0551 ± 0.002 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (1.275 MeV),0.0615 ± 0.006, 0.0614 ± 0.008, 0.0605 ± 0.008, 0.0601 ± 0.002, 0.0596 ± 0.001, and 0.0593 ± 0.008 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (1.173 MeV),0.0581 ± 0.002, 0.0579 ± 0.003, 0.0572 ± 0.003, 0.0568 ± 0.003, 0.0565 ± 0.005, and 0.0560 ± 0.001 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (1.332 MeV), and 0.1012 ± 0.002, 0.1015 ± 0.001, 0.1035 ± 0.001, 0.1066 ± 0.005, 0.1099 ± 0.008, and 0.1201 ± 0.007 cm<sup>2</sup>/g (356 keV), respectively. According to the results, the W5 samples can be selected as the most effective shielding material among the samples. In addition, the experimental data and the simulated values obtained from the four mentioned programs were in good agreement, indicating that the Monte Carlo codes and online programs are reliable tools for studying nuclear reactions with high accuracy while also saving time and costs.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Urmia University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
3.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.