Gender differences in subjective ratings of affective pictures: Methodological and conceptual implications for research on emotional health
Evidence of gender differences in norms in relation to affective picture databases is controversial when considering emotion from a dimensional perspective, and it is scarce from a categorical perspective. The present study explored the existence of gender differences in norms for the affective pictures included in the MATTER dataset and provided results of such differences in relation to dimensional and categorical ratings for each individual picture, as well as separate classifications of the pictures into discrete emotional categories, for both men and women. This could aid the selection of stimuli in studies that include participants of both genders. Moreover, gender differences in the ratings of each discrete emotional category of pictures were analyzed. The results suggested the presence of a negativity bias in women, who had higher disgust and fear ratings for fear and disgust pictures than men, and also rated erotic pictures as more disgusting than men. There was a positivity bias in men, who rated erotic, fear and disgust pictures as more mirthful, and disgust pictures as more erotic, than did women. Men also rated all categories of pictures as more interesting than did women. These gender differences are consistent with an evolution-based hypothesis, although sociocultural influences cannot be discounted and should be investigated in the future.
Authors
- Elisabeth Ruiz‐Padial (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-5756)
Institutions
- Universidad de Jaén (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Acta Psychologica
- Published
- 2025-10-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105774
- Primary Topic
- Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00