Characterizing volatile organic compound profiles in oral cancer using multiple sample collection approaches by GC-IMS and TD-GC-MS

Oral cancer (OC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis and limited early detection tools. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have emerged as potential biomarkers for early OC detection, offering a non-invasive approach. However, the optimal sample collection and analytical workflow remains unclear. This study compares the diagnostic potential and clinical feasibility of exhaled breath, lesional air, and lesional brushings using thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Twenty-six participants (13 OC or high-grade lesion patients, 13 controls) were recruited. Multivariate analysis assessed group separation and identified key discriminatory features. TD-GC-MS detected more VOCs and demonstrated stronger separation between OC and controls across all sample types compared to GC-IMS. Lesional brushings provided the best separation between groups, followed by lesional air and exhaled breath. Key discriminatory compounds included various alkanes, alkenes, aromatic hydrocarbons, phenylmethanol, and a homologous series of saturated ketones, many of which have been reported as OC biomarkers. Lesional brushings and lesional air analyzed by TD-GC-MS emerged as the most promising approaches for OC detection. GC-IMS, despite limitations, holds potential as a valuable point-of-care OC screening tool. VOC-based diagnostics offer a promising non-invasive approach for early OC detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15510-x
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing volatile organic compound profiles in oral cancer using multiple sample collection approaches by GC-IMS and TD-GC-MS

Scott A. Borden, Eitan Prisman, Lucas Martins, Catherine F. Poh et al.
Scientific Reports
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
article

Characterizing volatile organic compound profiles in oral cancer using multiple sample collection approaches by GC-IMS and TD-GC-MS

Scott A. Borden, Eitan Prisman, Lucas Martins, Catherine F. Poh, Kristian J. Kiland, Kelly Yi Ping Liu, Renelle Myers, Andrew C. Huang, J. Scott Durham
article en

Abstract

Oral cancer (OC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis and limited early detection tools. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have emerged as potential biomarkers for early OC detection, offering a non-invasive approach. However, the optimal sample collection and analytical workflow remains unclear. This study compares the diagnostic potential and clinical feasibility of exhaled breath, lesional air, and lesional brushings using thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Twenty-six participants (13 OC or high-grade lesion patients, 13 controls) were recruited. Multivariate analysis assessed group separation and identified key discriminatory features. TD-GC-MS detected more VOCs and demonstrated stronger separation between OC and controls across all sample types compared to GC-IMS. Lesional brushings provided the best separation between groups, followed by lesional air and exhaled breath. Key discriminatory compounds included various alkanes, alkenes, aromatic hydrocarbons, phenylmethanol, and a homologous series of saturated ketones, many of which have been reported as OC biomarkers. Lesional brushings and lesional air analyzed by TD-GC-MS emerged as the most promising approaches for OC detection. GC-IMS, despite limitations, holds potential as a valuable point-of-care OC screening tool. VOC-based diagnostics offer a promising non-invasive approach for early OC detection.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
BC Cancer Agency (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Vancouver General Hospital (CA)
BC Cancer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.