Flood Early Warning Systems in the White Volta Basin, Ghana: Challenges and Opportunities

ABSTRACT Flooding in Ghana's White Volta basin has caused widespread displacement, fatalities, and damage to infrastructure and livelihoods in agriculturally dependent communities. Despite the presence of national agencies such as the Ghana Meteorological Agency (GMet) and Ghana Hydrological Authority (GHA), early warning capabilities remain constrained by limited real‐time data, outdated infrastructure, and weak coordination. As a result, many residents continue to rely on traditional knowledge and informal coping strategies. This study qualitatively assesses the operational state of Flood Early Warning Systems (FEWS) in the White Volta basin, focusing on their effectiveness, limitations, and opportunities for improvement. Using semi‐structured interviews with 18 key stakeholders spanning government agencies, technical experts, and community leaders, we analysed the institutional and technical dynamics of Ghana's FEWS through thematic analysis. Findings reveal that although the myDEWETRA‐VOLTALARM platform offers 5‐day flood forecasts through social media, SMS, and radio, its warnings are often mistrusted or inaccessible to rural populations. Thematic analysis identified four critical gaps: institutional fragmentation, exclusion of local knowledge, inadequate data infrastructure, and last‐mile communication failures. These are complicated by the basin's unique environmental conditions, including transboundary dam releases, intense seasonal rainfall, flat terrain, and poor drainage. We conclude that the current FEWS framework remains insufficient for proactive flood risk governance. Strengthening institutional coordination, integrating community‐based adaptation practices, and investing in localized data and communication infrastructure are essential to improving system legitimacy and resilience. The study contributes to broader discourses on early warning systems in resource‐constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70146
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flood Early Warning Systems in the White Volta Basin, Ghana: Challenges and Opportunities

Ebenezer Gyampoh Amoah, Klaus Greve, Edmund I. Yamba, Josephine Thywill Katsekpor
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Flood Early Warning Systems in the White Volta Basin, Ghana: Challenges and Opportunities

Ebenezer Gyampoh Amoah, Klaus Greve, Edmund I. Yamba, Josephine Thywill Katsekpor
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Flooding in Ghana's White Volta basin has caused widespread displacement, fatalities, and damage to infrastructure and livelihoods in agriculturally dependent communities. Despite the presence of national agencies such as the Ghana Meteorological Agency (GMet) and Ghana Hydrological Authority (GHA), early warning capabilities remain constrained by limited real‐time data, outdated infrastructure, and weak coordination. As a result, many residents continue to rely on traditional knowledge and informal coping strategies. This study qualitatively assesses the operational state of Flood Early Warning Systems (FEWS) in the White Volta basin, focusing on their effectiveness, limitations, and opportunities for improvement. Using semi‐structured interviews with 18 key stakeholders spanning government agencies, technical experts, and community leaders, we analysed the institutional and technical dynamics of Ghana's FEWS through thematic analysis. Findings reveal that although the myDEWETRA‐VOLTALARM platform offers 5‐day flood forecasts through social media, SMS, and radio, its warnings are often mistrusted or inaccessible to rural populations. Thematic analysis identified four critical gaps: institutional fragmentation, exclusion of local knowledge, inadequate data infrastructure, and last‐mile communication failures. These are complicated by the basin's unique environmental conditions, including transboundary dam releases, intense seasonal rainfall, flat terrain, and poor drainage. We conclude that the current FEWS framework remains insufficient for proactive flood risk governance. Strengthening institutional coordination, integrating community‐based adaptation practices, and investing in localized data and communication infrastructure are essential to improving system legitimacy and resilience. The study contributes to broader discourses on early warning systems in resource‐constrained settings.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 18(4)
University of Bonn (DE), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Northumbria University (GB)
Katholischer Akademischer Ausländer-Dienst
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.