Cosmoerotics and Cosmoagonistics from Herder to Hölderlin

Abstract: In key texts of eighteenth-century philosophy and poetry, distinct fields of symbolization imbue planetary-cosmological ways of knowing with affective charges, facilitating the ramification of cosmologies into practices, arts of living, and forms of habituation. Two dominant conceptual dynamics drive this transformation: cosmoerotics and cosmoagonistics. Cosmoerotics postulates erotic desire—in fusional semantics, attractions, linkages—as a material and ontological dynamic that becomes the basis for rethinking individual and collective logics. Cosmoagonistics naturalizes forms of conflict and violence that establish, maintain, or efface distinctions in ways that also facilitate the reimagination of individual and collective forms. The occupation of positions within a cosmoerotic-cosmoagonistic matrix can be regarded as a prominent discursive feature of speculative and aesthetic systems and a strategic interface in attempts to change or stabilize cultural forms: in Hemsterhuis' moral organ attuned to the "moral face" of the universe; in Herder's conception of conflict as a condition of emergence and individuation; in Schelling's ecology of struggle in his 1799 nature-philosophy; in Goethe's Faustian cosmoerotics and his nature-philosophical poetry; in Günderrode's idea of the earth; and in Hölderlin's oeuvre, which intensifies contradictions within the cosmoerotic-cosmoagonistic matrix.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MLN
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.2025.a972226
Primary Topic
German Literature and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cosmoerotics and Cosmoagonistics from Herder to Hölderlin

Gabriel Trop
MLN
German Literature and Culture Studies
article

Cosmoerotics and Cosmoagonistics from Herder to Hölderlin

Gabriel Trop
article en

Abstract

Abstract: In key texts of eighteenth-century philosophy and poetry, distinct fields of symbolization imbue planetary-cosmological ways of knowing with affective charges, facilitating the ramification of cosmologies into practices, arts of living, and forms of habituation. Two dominant conceptual dynamics drive this transformation: cosmoerotics and cosmoagonistics. Cosmoerotics postulates erotic desire—in fusional semantics, attractions, linkages—as a material and ontological dynamic that becomes the basis for rethinking individual and collective logics. Cosmoagonistics naturalizes forms of conflict and violence that establish, maintain, or efface distinctions in ways that also facilitate the reimagination of individual and collective forms. The occupation of positions within a cosmoerotic-cosmoagonistic matrix can be regarded as a prominent discursive feature of speculative and aesthetic systems and a strategic interface in attempts to change or stabilize cultural forms: in Hemsterhuis' moral organ attuned to the "moral face" of the universe; in Herder's conception of conflict as a condition of emergence and individuation; in Schelling's ecology of struggle in his 1799 nature-philosophy; in Goethe's Faustian cosmoerotics and his nature-philosophical poetry; in Günderrode's idea of the earth; and in Hölderlin's oeuvre, which intensifies contradictions within the cosmoerotic-cosmoagonistic matrix.

MLNVol. 140(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
German Literature and Culture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.