Effectiveness and Safety of Common Non-Oncologic Pharmaceuticals in Cancer Management: A Systematic Review

Background. De novo anticancer drug development is lengthy, costly, and risky, motivating cautious evaluation of off-label use of common non-oncologic agents where mechanistic plausibility and clinical signals exist. Objectives. To synthesize the effectiveness and safety of frequently repurposed non-oncologic drug classes in oncology and to identify priorities for practice and research. Methods. A PRISMA-guided systematic review (2015–2025) screened titles/abstracts and full texts in duplicate, with standardized extraction and narrative/thematic synthesis. Records identified: 1,699; duplicates removed: 119; other removals (missing metadata): 33; records screened: 1,547; excluded at title/abstract: 956; reports sought: 591; not retrieved: 410; assessed for eligibility: 181; included: 181. Outcomes included OS, PFS/DFS, ORR, QoL, and CTCAE-graded toxicities. Results. Antihypertensives comprised the largest class, followed by antidiabetics, statins, anti-inflammatories/aspirin, antibiotics, antidepressants, and anthelmintics; lung, breast, colorectal, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers were most represented. Signals suggest possible benefit for overall survival and mortality, with limited and inconsistent evidence for PFS/DFS and ORR; QoL was rarely reported. Outcome definitions, progression ascertainment, censoring rules, exposure metrics (dose, duration, timing), and reporting completeness were heterogeneous, constraining meta-analytic pooling and causal inference. Conclusion. Generalized repurposing for oncology is not supported at this time beyond established non-oncologic indications. Biologically coherent, low-toxicity signals, most consistently for β-blockade and RAAS modulation, and more variably for metformin, statins, and aspirin, justify targeted, rigorously designed evaluation in prospective trials and robust observational emulations, with harmonized endpoints and systematic CTCAE capture. Equity-by-design, common data elements, preregistration, and data/code sharing are essential to accelerate credible, practice-informing evidence. Keywords: Non-Oncologic Agents, Effectiveness and Safety, Cancer Management

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v15i10.7415
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and Safety of Common Non-Oncologic Pharmaceuticals in Cancer Management: A Systematic Review

Luc Zongo, Nomtondo Amina Ouédraogo, Yilédoma T. M. LENGANE, Jacques Simporè et al.
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Effectiveness and Safety of Common Non-Oncologic Pharmaceuticals in Cancer Management: A Systematic Review

Luc Zongo, Nomtondo Amina Ouédraogo, Yilédoma T. M. LENGANE, Jacques Simporè, Modeste W. OUEDRAOGO, B T Dembéle, Moussa Zongo, Théodora Mahoukèdè Zohoncon, L. Kaboré, Heiko Lange, Raogo Ouédraogo, Edward Bell, Davy P-W BEMBAMBA, Wilfried F. P. TRAORE, Rosemary R. CANFUA, Michel PALUKU MUKULULI
article en

Abstract

Background. De novo anticancer drug development is lengthy, costly, and risky, motivating cautious evaluation of off-label use of common non-oncologic agents where mechanistic plausibility and clinical signals exist. Objectives. To synthesize the effectiveness and safety of frequently repurposed non-oncologic drug classes in oncology and to identify priorities for practice and research. Methods. A PRISMA-guided systematic review (2015–2025) screened titles/abstracts and full texts in duplicate, with standardized extraction and narrative/thematic synthesis. Records identified: 1,699; duplicates removed: 119; other removals (missing metadata): 33; records screened: 1,547; excluded at title/abstract: 956; reports sought: 591; not retrieved: 410; assessed for eligibility: 181; included: 181. Outcomes included OS, PFS/DFS, ORR, QoL, and CTCAE-graded toxicities. Results. Antihypertensives comprised the largest class, followed by antidiabetics, statins, anti-inflammatories/aspirin, antibiotics, antidepressants, and anthelmintics; lung, breast, colorectal, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers were most represented. Signals suggest possible benefit for overall survival and mortality, with limited and inconsistent evidence for PFS/DFS and ORR; QoL was rarely reported. Outcome definitions, progression ascertainment, censoring rules, exposure metrics (dose, duration, timing), and reporting completeness were heterogeneous, constraining meta-analytic pooling and causal inference. Conclusion. Generalized repurposing for oncology is not supported at this time beyond established non-oncologic indications. Biologically coherent, low-toxicity signals, most consistently for β-blockade and RAAS modulation, and more variably for metformin, statins, and aspirin, justify targeted, rigorously designed evaluation in prospective trials and robust observational emulations, with harmonized endpoints and systematic CTCAE capture. Equity-by-design, common data elements, preregistration, and data/code sharing are essential to accelerate credible, practice-informing evidence. Keywords: Non-Oncologic Agents, Effectiveness and Safety, Cancer Management

Journal of Drug Delivery and TherapeuticsVol. 15(10)
Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo (BF), University of Douala (CM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR), Institut Supérieur de Technique Médicale (CD), National Biodiversity Institute (CR), Essential Research (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.