Optical and simulated visual outcomes of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses tested in clinically relevant decentration and tilt conditions

We evaluated the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) misalignment on image quality under clinically relevant conditions (0.2, 0.4 mm decentration and 2°, 4° tilt). Two presbyopia-correcting IOLs, an extended depth of focus (EDOF) (Alcon Vivity) and a diffractive multifocal (Alcon PanOptix), were tested. Through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF)-based measures were taken using an on-bench model eye with average corneal spherical aberration and apertures of 3.0 and 4.5 mm. Optical image quality and simulated visual acuity (VA) were assessed for both aligned and misaligned IOLs. The aligned EDOF lens showed superior distance vision quality compared to the multifocal, particularly with the 4.5 mm pupil. The EDOF lens was, however, more sensitive to decentration than the multifocal, which showed very low sensitivity across far, intermediate, and near regions with both apertures. Degradation with IOL tilt occurred at a slower rate than with decentration. Despite the optical degradation produced by mild misalignment (up to 0.4 mm decentration and 4° tilt), the predicted VA demonstrates that these effects should be negligible on postoperative vision with a 3 mm pupil. This holds true not only at a far distance, but also at the relevant intermediate and near foci.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Optics Express
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.574638
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optical and simulated visual outcomes of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses tested in clinically relevant decentration and tilt conditions

Marı́a S. Millán, Fidel Vega, José F. Alfonso, Fátima Cuéllar et al.
2 citations
Biomedical Optics Express
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
2.71
article

Optical and simulated visual outcomes of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses tested in clinically relevant decentration and tilt conditions

Marı́a S. Millán, Fidel Vega, José F. Alfonso, Fátima Cuéllar, David Madrid‐Costa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) misalignment on image quality under clinically relevant conditions (0.2, 0.4 mm decentration and 2°, 4° tilt). Two presbyopia-correcting IOLs, an extended depth of focus (EDOF) (Alcon Vivity) and a diffractive multifocal (Alcon PanOptix), were tested. Through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF)-based measures were taken using an on-bench model eye with average corneal spherical aberration and apertures of 3.0 and 4.5 mm. Optical image quality and simulated visual acuity (VA) were assessed for both aligned and misaligned IOLs. The aligned EDOF lens showed superior distance vision quality compared to the multifocal, particularly with the 4.5 mm pupil. The EDOF lens was, however, more sensitive to decentration than the multifocal, which showed very low sensitivity across far, intermediate, and near regions with both apertures. Degradation with IOL tilt occurred at a slower rate than with decentration. Despite the optical degradation produced by mild misalignment (up to 0.4 mm decentration and 4° tilt), the predicted VA demonstrates that these effects should be negligible on postoperative vision with a 3 mm pupil. This holds true not only at a far distance, but also at the relevant intermediate and near foci.

Biomedical Optics ExpressVol. 16(12)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.