Towards a complex systems model of evidence for public health

There has been growing interest in the adoption of complex systems approaches to tackle major public health challenges such as obesity. This perspective redirects focus from individually oriented and narrowly focused interventions towards strategies that reshape structural drivers of health and disease across multiple levels, offering novel avenues for enhancing population health and tackling health inequalities. Despite growing consensus on the use of a complex systems model of evidence to support these kinds of approaches, there remains limited agreement on the types of evidence required both to understand and to tackle complex public health problems. In this paper, we propose a complex systems model of evidence that combines three types of evidence-causal, intervention, implementation-across three dimensions of complex systems-mechanisms, dynamics and patterns. This model thus identifies nine categories of evidence: <i>causal evidence</i>, which explains the mechanisms behind public health problems, the dynamics driving changes therein and emerging health patterns; <i>intervention evidence,</i> which focuses on the set of actions that can modify these mechanisms and dynamics, including their intended and unintended consequences on health outcomes and <i>implementation evidence,</i> which addresses what is needed to implement systems change effectively, how systems adapt to these changes and how systems changes contribute to changes in health patterns. This complex systems model of evidence may serve as a guide to researchers and decision-makers when designing research programmes and evidence-based policies in response to complex public health problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Global Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-021061
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a complex systems model of evidence for public health

Harry Rutter, Morten Hulvej Rod, Karien Stronks, Naja Hulvej Rod
3 citations
BMJ Global Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
8.45
article

Towards a complex systems model of evidence for public health

Harry Rutter, Morten Hulvej Rod, Karien Stronks, Naja Hulvej Rod
article en
3 citations

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the adoption of complex systems approaches to tackle major public health challenges such as obesity. This perspective redirects focus from individually oriented and narrowly focused interventions towards strategies that reshape structural drivers of health and disease across multiple levels, offering novel avenues for enhancing population health and tackling health inequalities. Despite growing consensus on the use of a complex systems model of evidence to support these kinds of approaches, there remains limited agreement on the types of evidence required both to understand and to tackle complex public health problems. In this paper, we propose a complex systems model of evidence that combines three types of evidence-causal, intervention, implementation-across three dimensions of complex systems-mechanisms, dynamics and patterns. This model thus identifies nine categories of evidence: <i>causal evidence</i>, which explains the mechanisms behind public health problems, the dynamics driving changes therein and emerging health patterns; <i>intervention evidence,</i> which focuses on the set of actions that can modify these mechanisms and dynamics, including their intended and unintended consequences on health outcomes and <i>implementation evidence,</i> which addresses what is needed to implement systems change effectively, how systems adapt to these changes and how systems changes contribute to changes in health patterns. This complex systems model of evidence may serve as a guide to researchers and decision-makers when designing research programmes and evidence-based policies in response to complex public health problems.

BMJ Global HealthVol. 10(10)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Department of Public (IN), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), University of Bath (GB), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Health Policy Implementation Science
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.