Reconsidering Governance Models to Strengthen Rural Healthcare

This paper argues for a re-balancing of decision-making power in health systems away from metrocentric and technocratic norms and a fundamental re-shaping towards democratic and participatory models of governance. These changes are understood as critical to the objective of improving healthcare access and delivery in regional, rural, and remote communities. In articulating this argument, we highlight the highly political nature of how we structure and govern healthcare delivery, which is imbued with value judgments. We critique currently dominant neo-liberal approaches to healthcare governance that frame the "voices" of local communities as optional inputs into the system, rather than active agents in decision-making processes. From health justice and spatial justice perspectives, public participation in governance may be an important factor to enable improved access to regional, rural, and remote health services and to promote community self-determination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10484-x
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering Governance Models to Strengthen Rural Healthcare

Lawrence Elliott, Kelly Purser, Christina Malatzky, Deanna Sedgwick Fincher et al.
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Reconsidering Governance Models to Strengthen Rural Healthcare

Lawrence Elliott, Kelly Purser, Christina Malatzky, Deanna Sedgwick Fincher, Fiona McDonald
article en

Abstract

This paper argues for a re-balancing of decision-making power in health systems away from metrocentric and technocratic norms and a fundamental re-shaping towards democratic and participatory models of governance. These changes are understood as critical to the objective of improving healthcare access and delivery in regional, rural, and remote communities. In articulating this argument, we highlight the highly political nature of how we structure and govern healthcare delivery, which is imbued with value judgments. We critique currently dominant neo-liberal approaches to healthcare governance that frame the "voices" of local communities as optional inputs into the system, rather than active agents in decision-making processes. From health justice and spatial justice perspectives, public participation in governance may be an important factor to enable improved access to regional, rural, and remote health services and to promote community self-determination.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Queensland University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.