Identifying Antifragile Communities in Complex Networks by Complexity Assessment

ABSTRACT Detecting antifragile communities is crucial for understanding complex network structures and dynamics. Communities can be categorized as fragile, robust or antifragile based on their inherent properties. This paper proposes a theoretical framework to identify community states using complexity measures. Initially, single‐node and multi‐node elimination perturbations are applied to selected communities within networks. Subsequently, the community's entropy before and after each perturbation and the resulting complexity variations are computed. To validate this framework, five distinct synthetic and three real‐world complex networks, each spanning multiple snapshots, are analysed. The findings reveal that communities with an initial entropy exceeding 0.5 out of 1 demonstrate antifragility, while those with initial entropy below 0.5 exhibit fragility in response to perturbations. Communities that become more complex are considered antifragile, whereas those that experience a decrease in complexity are deemed fragile. Our analysis also reveals a positive correlation between antifragility and both network density and average degree.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3203
Primary Topic
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Antifragile Communities in Complex Networks by Complexity Assessment

Mohammad Khansari, Muhammad Bayat
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
article

Identifying Antifragile Communities in Complex Networks by Complexity Assessment

Mohammad Khansari, Muhammad Bayat
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Detecting antifragile communities is crucial for understanding complex network structures and dynamics. Communities can be categorized as fragile, robust or antifragile based on their inherent properties. This paper proposes a theoretical framework to identify community states using complexity measures. Initially, single‐node and multi‐node elimination perturbations are applied to selected communities within networks. Subsequently, the community's entropy before and after each perturbation and the resulting complexity variations are computed. To validate this framework, five distinct synthetic and three real‐world complex networks, each spanning multiple snapshots, are analysed. The findings reveal that communities with an initial entropy exceeding 0.5 out of 1 demonstrate antifragility, while those with initial entropy below 0.5 exhibit fragility in response to perturbations. Communities that become more complex are considered antifragile, whereas those that experience a decrease in complexity are deemed fragile. Our analysis also reveals a positive correlation between antifragility and both network density and average degree.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science
University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.