Estimating surface sulfur dioxide concentrations from satellite data over eastern China: Using chemical transport models vs. machine learning

Abstract. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is an important air pollutant that contributes to negative health effects, acid rain, and aerosol formation and growth. SO2 has been measured using ground-based air quality monitoring networks, but routine monitoring sites are predominantly in urban areas, leaving large gaps in the network in less populated locations. Previous studies have used chemical transport models (CTMs) or machine learning (ML) techniques to estimate surface SO2 concentrations from satellite vertical column densities, but their performance has never been directly compared. In this study, we estimated surface SO2 concentrations using Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) retrievals over eastern China from 2015–2018 utilizing GEOS-Chem CTM simulations and an extreme gradient boosting ML model. For the first time, we quantified methodological uncertainties for both methods and directly compared their performance on the same truth dataset. The surface concentrations estimated from the CTM-based method had similar spatial distributions (r=0.58) and temporal variations compared to the in situ measurements but were underestimated (slope = 0.24; RPE = 75 %) and had worsening performance over time. The ML-based method produced more accurate spatial distributions (r = 0.77) and temporal variations with a smaller discrepancy (slope = 0.69; RPE = 30 %) and stable performance over time. Despite the higher accuracy of the ML-based method at the monitoring sites, the CTM-based method produced more reasonable gridded spatial distributions over areas without monitoring data. These results suggest that satellite data could be a reliable way to estimate global SO2 concentrations to parameterize other chemical processes in the atmosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13527-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating surface sulfur dioxide concentrations from satellite data over eastern China: Using chemical transport models vs. machine learning

Shan‐Hu Lee, Jun Wang, Sean W. Freeman, Fei Liu et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
article

Estimating surface sulfur dioxide concentrations from satellite data over eastern China: Using chemical transport models vs. machine learning

Shan‐Hu Lee, Jun Wang, Sean W. Freeman, Fei Liu, Zachary Watson, Can Li, Huanxin Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is an important air pollutant that contributes to negative health effects, acid rain, and aerosol formation and growth. SO2 has been measured using ground-based air quality monitoring networks, but routine monitoring sites are predominantly in urban areas, leaving large gaps in the network in less populated locations. Previous studies have used chemical transport models (CTMs) or machine learning (ML) techniques to estimate surface SO2 concentrations from satellite vertical column densities, but their performance has never been directly compared. In this study, we estimated surface SO2 concentrations using Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) retrievals over eastern China from 2015–2018 utilizing GEOS-Chem CTM simulations and an extreme gradient boosting ML model. For the first time, we quantified methodological uncertainties for both methods and directly compared their performance on the same truth dataset. The surface concentrations estimated from the CTM-based method had similar spatial distributions (r=0.58) and temporal variations compared to the in situ measurements but were underestimated (slope = 0.24; RPE = 75 %) and had worsening performance over time. The ML-based method produced more accurate spatial distributions (r = 0.77) and temporal variations with a smaller discrepancy (slope = 0.69; RPE = 30 %) and stable performance over time. Despite the higher accuracy of the ML-based method at the monitoring sites, the CTM-based method produced more reasonable gridded spatial distributions over areas without monitoring data. These results suggest that satellite data could be a reliable way to estimate global SO2 concentrations to parameterize other chemical processes in the atmosphere.

Atmospheric chemistry and physicsVol. 25(20)
University of Iowa (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of Alabama in Huntsville (US), Morgan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.