Bioethics and the soft power of sport: a contemporary perspective

This article offers a perspective on the political dimensions of bioethics within elite sport, particularly regarding the regulation of performance-enhancing methods. Drawing from historical and contemporary examples, it suggests that bioethical decision-making in sport is often influenced by geopolitical agendas, institutional power relations, and national interests. Focusing on the World Anti-Doping Agency's regulatory process, the article argues that scientific assessments may be shaped or delayed by stakeholder lobbying, soft power strategies, and disparities in global access to biomedical innovation. Rather than providing a comprehensive review, this article reflects the author's viewpoint on how bioethics operates within contested frameworks of legitimacy, equity, and global influence. It concludes that recognizing bioethics as politically embedded is crucial for fostering fairer, more transparent, and globally representative governance in sport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1683697
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioethics and the soft power of sport: a contemporary perspective

Marina Kameņecka-Usova
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Doping in Sports
article

Bioethics and the soft power of sport: a contemporary perspective

Marina Kameņecka-Usova
article en

Abstract

This article offers a perspective on the political dimensions of bioethics within elite sport, particularly regarding the regulation of performance-enhancing methods. Drawing from historical and contemporary examples, it suggests that bioethical decision-making in sport is often influenced by geopolitical agendas, institutional power relations, and national interests. Focusing on the World Anti-Doping Agency's regulatory process, the article argues that scientific assessments may be shaped or delayed by stakeholder lobbying, soft power strategies, and disparities in global access to biomedical innovation. Rather than providing a comprehensive review, this article reflects the author's viewpoint on how bioethics operates within contested frameworks of legitimacy, equity, and global influence. It concludes that recognizing bioethics as politically embedded is crucial for fostering fairer, more transparent, and globally representative governance in sport.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 7
Riga Stradiņš University (LV), EKA University of Applied Sciences (LV)
Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.