What Are the Effects of Cattle Grazing on Conservation and Forage Value Across Grazing Pressure Gradients in Alkali Grasslands?

Studying the effects of grazing pressure on species composition, beta diversity and yields is important for conservation purposes as well as for grassland management. The case study area in Hortobágy, which is one of the largest continuous grassland areas in Europe, has been managed for centuries by grazing of Hungarian grey cattle. The effect of grazing pressure was investigated in terms of distance from the livestock enclosure (50 m, 250 m, 500 m, 1000 m, and 1700 m) and in an ungrazed control area on dry and mesic alkaline grasslands in spring and autumn of 2024. In both types of grasslands at each distance, species composition and mean plant height were recorded in six 4 × 4 m plots. Overall, in both seasons the control areas were the poorest in terms of species richness. Among the grazed areas in both grassland types the ones at 1700 m distance had the lowest number of species. The species richness of mesic grassland decreased linearly with distance. The dry grassland showed a polynomial trend and was more species-rich at all distances than the mesic grassland. Green yield was the highest in the dry grassland at 250 m in spring and at 50 m in autumn, while in the mesic grassland it was highest at 1700 m in spring and between 500 and 1700 m in autumn. Forage quality in dry grassland was lowest at 50 m and highest between 500 and 1000 m. In mesic grassland, this parameter was equalized at all distances. The highest Simpson diversity was found at a distance of 500–1000 m from the livestock enclosure in both types. It is advisable to evaluate separately the spring and autumn characteristics of the alkaline grasslands, as there may be significant differences between them. Overall, it can be concluded that alkaline dry grasslands are particularly suitable for grazing because of their species composition and their good tolerance to grazing. Alkaline mesic grasslands are poorer in species and more sensitive to grazing; consequently, mowing or mixed utilization should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/d17110741
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Are the Effects of Cattle Grazing on Conservation and Forage Value Across Grazing Pressure Gradients in Alkali Grasslands?

Szilárd Szentes, Zsombor Wágenhoffer, Orsolya Pintér, Péter Penksza et al.
Diversity
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

What Are the Effects of Cattle Grazing on Conservation and Forage Value Across Grazing Pressure Gradients in Alkali Grasslands?

Szilárd Szentes, Zsombor Wágenhoffer, Orsolya Pintér, Péter Penksza, Péter Szőke, Ágnes Freiler-Nagy, Edina Kárpáti, Laina Hilma Sari, Dániel Balogh, Szilvia Orosz, Ferenc Pajor, István Szatmári, Károly Penksza, János Balogh, Eszter Saláta-Falusi, Petra Balogh, Dániel Bori
article en

Abstract

Studying the effects of grazing pressure on species composition, beta diversity and yields is important for conservation purposes as well as for grassland management. The case study area in Hortobágy, which is one of the largest continuous grassland areas in Europe, has been managed for centuries by grazing of Hungarian grey cattle. The effect of grazing pressure was investigated in terms of distance from the livestock enclosure (50 m, 250 m, 500 m, 1000 m, and 1700 m) and in an ungrazed control area on dry and mesic alkaline grasslands in spring and autumn of 2024. In both types of grasslands at each distance, species composition and mean plant height were recorded in six 4 × 4 m plots. Overall, in both seasons the control areas were the poorest in terms of species richness. Among the grazed areas in both grassland types the ones at 1700 m distance had the lowest number of species. The species richness of mesic grassland decreased linearly with distance. The dry grassland showed a polynomial trend and was more species-rich at all distances than the mesic grassland. Green yield was the highest in the dry grassland at 250 m in spring and at 50 m in autumn, while in the mesic grassland it was highest at 1700 m in spring and between 500 and 1700 m in autumn. Forage quality in dry grassland was lowest at 50 m and highest between 500 and 1000 m. In mesic grassland, this parameter was equalized at all distances. The highest Simpson diversity was found at a distance of 500–1000 m from the livestock enclosure in both types. It is advisable to evaluate separately the spring and autumn characteristics of the alkaline grasslands, as there may be significant differences between them. Overall, it can be concluded that alkaline dry grasslands are particularly suitable for grazing because of their species composition and their good tolerance to grazing. Alkaline mesic grasslands are poorer in species and more sensitive to grazing; consequently, mowing or mixed utilization should be considered.

DiversityVol. 17(11)
Budapest University of Economics and Business (HU), Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU), University of Veterinary Medicine (HU), Plant Protection Institute (HU), Anton Paar (Austria) (AT), Hortobágy National Park Directorate (HU), Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.