Impact of Systematic Follicular Flushing on Egg Retrieval and Embryo Quality in IVF-ICSI Cycles: A Controlled Study?

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular aspiration is a central procedure in in vitro fertilisation (IVF), aiming to collect oocytes necessary for the success of assisted reproduction treatments. Follicular flushing, proposed in the absence of cumulo-oocyte complex (COC) at initial aspiration, remains controversial regarding its real impact on oocyte quality and pregnancy rates. <b>Methods</b>: In this controlled study, conducted in 274 patients, we evaluated the effects of systematic follicular flushing up to 10 washes with a standardised medium (pH 7.3 ± 0.1; 37.2 ± 0.2 °C) on oocyte yield, oocyte morphology, embryo kinetics and clinical outcomes. <b>Results</b>: Flushing resulted in an additional 38% recovery of COCs, mostly between the second and fifth flush, with no significant increase in oocyte dysmorphisms or major embryonic abnormalities. A slight increase in slow cleavages was observed (27% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), as well as a lower oocyte maturation rate when ovulation was triggered by Ovitrelle alone. Clinically, pregnancy rates per transfer were comparable between groups (33.27% without flushing vs. 32.86% with flushing; <i>p</i> = 0.67), as were miscarriage rates (9.11% vs. 8.69%; <i>p</i> = 0.81). <b>Conclusions</b>: These results indicate that follicular flushing, when applied according to a standardised protocol, significantly increases oocyte yield without compromising oocyte morphological quality or embryonic development potential. Although the observed clinical benefits remain modest, this approach could constitute a relevant complementary strategy, particularly in patients with poor ovarian response or in the context of poor initial recovery. However, the controlled but non-randomised nature of this study requires cautious interpretation of the findings. Larger randomised trials, integrating dynamic assessment technologies, such as time-lapse imaging or oocyte transcriptomic analysis, are needed to refine the clinical indications of this technique and explore its underlying biological mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217457
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Systematic Follicular Flushing on Egg Retrieval and Embryo Quality in IVF-ICSI Cycles: A Controlled Study?

Mehdi Hissane, Moncef Benkhalifa, Modou Mamoune Mbaye, Mohamed Ennaji et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Impact of Systematic Follicular Flushing on Egg Retrieval and Embryo Quality in IVF-ICSI Cycles: A Controlled Study?

Mehdi Hissane, Moncef Benkhalifa, Modou Mamoune Mbaye, Mohamed Ennaji, Mohammed Zarqaoui, Wassym Rhazi Senhaji, Noureddine Louanjli, Taha Rhouda, Bouchra El Khalfi, Abdelaziz Soukri, Abdelhafid Natiq, Bouchra Ghazi, Yasmine Louanjli
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular aspiration is a central procedure in in vitro fertilisation (IVF), aiming to collect oocytes necessary for the success of assisted reproduction treatments. Follicular flushing, proposed in the absence of cumulo-oocyte complex (COC) at initial aspiration, remains controversial regarding its real impact on oocyte quality and pregnancy rates. <b>Methods</b>: In this controlled study, conducted in 274 patients, we evaluated the effects of systematic follicular flushing up to 10 washes with a standardised medium (pH 7.3 ± 0.1; 37.2 ± 0.2 °C) on oocyte yield, oocyte morphology, embryo kinetics and clinical outcomes. <b>Results</b>: Flushing resulted in an additional 38% recovery of COCs, mostly between the second and fifth flush, with no significant increase in oocyte dysmorphisms or major embryonic abnormalities. A slight increase in slow cleavages was observed (27% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), as well as a lower oocyte maturation rate when ovulation was triggered by Ovitrelle alone. Clinically, pregnancy rates per transfer were comparable between groups (33.27% without flushing vs. 32.86% with flushing; <i>p</i> = 0.67), as were miscarriage rates (9.11% vs. 8.69%; <i>p</i> = 0.81). <b>Conclusions</b>: These results indicate that follicular flushing, when applied according to a standardised protocol, significantly increases oocyte yield without compromising oocyte morphological quality or embryonic development potential. Although the observed clinical benefits remain modest, this approach could constitute a relevant complementary strategy, particularly in patients with poor ovarian response or in the context of poor initial recovery. However, the controlled but non-randomised nature of this study requires cautious interpretation of the findings. Larger randomised trials, integrating dynamic assessment technologies, such as time-lapse imaging or oocyte transcriptomic analysis, are needed to refine the clinical indications of this technique and explore its underlying biological mechanisms.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
Mohammed V University (MA), Université Mohammed VI des Sciences et de la Santé (MA), OCP Group (Morocco) (MA), Périnatalité & Risques Toxiques (FR), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.