Cement Augmentation of the Blade in Proximal Femoral Nailing for Trochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Comparison of Mechanical Stability and Complications

<b>Background</b>: Cephalomedullary nails are the standard treatment of trochanteric fractures, and some implants with a perforated blade allow augmentation with bone cement to increase mechanical stability. The study compares the results of PFNA and TFNA implants (DePuy Synthes) with or without cement augmentation of the blade. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study evaluated 219 trochanteric fractures. The study included 59 men (27%) and 160 women (73%), with a mean patient age of 82 years. The most common fractures were type 31A2 (56%), followed by type 31A1 (25%) and type 31A3 (19%). The monitored parameters were evaluated from anteroposterior and axial images of the proximal femur and pelvis. TAD, blade position, lateral blade prominence, fracture varus, and cut-out were evaluated. <b>Results</b>: Cement-augmented blade implants (CABs) in 68 patients (31%) and cement-free implants (NCABs) in 151 patients (69%) were used. The average age difference between the groups was 7 years (CAB 86.07 ± 5.85 and NCAB 79.13 ± 8.48). CABs were used more frequently in women (60 cases) than in men (8 cases). Blade position was optimal in 68% of cases and suboptimal in 32%. The risk of varus deformities was not statistically significantly affected by the blade position. The statistical significance of CABs for reducing the risk of varus deformities in stable fractures (<i>p</i> = 0.396) or unstable fractures (<i>p</i> = 0.101) was not confirmed. The average varus angulation during treatment was 2.57° (CAB 2.53° and NCAB 2.67°). A varus deformity greater than 10° was confirmed in 8 eight patients (3.7%) and cut-out in three patients (1.4%). All patients with cut-out were in the NCAB group. Cement leakage occurred in two cases and was asymptomatic. One case of deep infection, lateral blade prominence, and avascular necrosis (AVN) were recorded. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cement augmentation of the blade did not significantly reduce varus deformity in this cohort, regardless of blade position of fracture stability. CABs may prevent cut-out in specific subgroups, but this requires further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217469
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cement Augmentation of the Blade in Proximal Femoral Nailing for Trochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Comparison of Mechanical Stability and Complications

Marian Melišík, Zoltán Cibula, Marian Grendár, Maroš Hrubina et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hip and Femur Fractures
6.02
article

Cement Augmentation of the Blade in Proximal Femoral Nailing for Trochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Comparison of Mechanical Stability and Complications

Marian Melišík, Zoltán Cibula, Marian Grendár, Maroš Hrubina, Diaa Sammoudi, Milan Cipkala
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Cephalomedullary nails are the standard treatment of trochanteric fractures, and some implants with a perforated blade allow augmentation with bone cement to increase mechanical stability. The study compares the results of PFNA and TFNA implants (DePuy Synthes) with or without cement augmentation of the blade. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study evaluated 219 trochanteric fractures. The study included 59 men (27%) and 160 women (73%), with a mean patient age of 82 years. The most common fractures were type 31A2 (56%), followed by type 31A1 (25%) and type 31A3 (19%). The monitored parameters were evaluated from anteroposterior and axial images of the proximal femur and pelvis. TAD, blade position, lateral blade prominence, fracture varus, and cut-out were evaluated. <b>Results</b>: Cement-augmented blade implants (CABs) in 68 patients (31%) and cement-free implants (NCABs) in 151 patients (69%) were used. The average age difference between the groups was 7 years (CAB 86.07 ± 5.85 and NCAB 79.13 ± 8.48). CABs were used more frequently in women (60 cases) than in men (8 cases). Blade position was optimal in 68% of cases and suboptimal in 32%. The risk of varus deformities was not statistically significantly affected by the blade position. The statistical significance of CABs for reducing the risk of varus deformities in stable fractures (<i>p</i> = 0.396) or unstable fractures (<i>p</i> = 0.101) was not confirmed. The average varus angulation during treatment was 2.57° (CAB 2.53° and NCAB 2.67°). A varus deformity greater than 10° was confirmed in 8 eight patients (3.7%) and cut-out in three patients (1.4%). All patients with cut-out were in the NCAB group. Cement leakage occurred in two cases and was asymptomatic. One case of deep infection, lateral blade prominence, and avascular necrosis (AVN) were recorded. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cement augmentation of the blade did not significantly reduce varus deformity in this cohort, regardless of blade position of fracture stability. CABs may prevent cut-out in specific subgroups, but this requires further investigation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
Martin University Hospital (SK), Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hip and Femur Fractures
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.