The Influence of Orthogeriatric Co-Management on Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures—Real World Data of Comparable Cohorts Originating from the Same Geographic Area

<b>Background</b>: Surgically treated proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients are a major debilitating condition, with continuously rising numbers, impacting patients and the healthcare system. Models of care based on orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) have suggested promising clinical outcomes compared with the standard of care (SOC) model in the treatment of frail elderly patients. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study investigating clinical outcomes in two comparable cohorts of patients aged 75 and older, who underwent surgical treatment for proximal femoral fractures in 2023 was conducted. Included individuals all originated from the same geographic area, therefore presenting a unique cohort. The cohorts were differentiated by the perioperative care protocols implemented: an OGCM protocol (<i>n</i> = 147) versus a SOC protocol (<i>n</i> = 143). The main outcome measures were readmission, revision, and mortality rates at 30 days and one-year post-surgery, as well as the length of hospital stay. <b>Results</b>: Findings revealed a positive impact for patients treated under the OGCM protocol, with a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay (6 vs. 7 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001), while no consistent differences were observed in readmission (36.2% vs. 39.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.676), surgical revision (8.4% vs. 12.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.485), and mortality (24.1% vs. 31.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.781) rates one-year after surgery. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite the absence of significant differences in major outcomes such as mortality, readmission, and surgical revision between the two protocols, the implementation of a more resource-intensive multidisciplinary care pathway resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay. Beyond its clinical value, this improvement may contribute to reducing the burden on healthcare staff and support the sustainability of hospital systems facing increasing pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217464
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Orthogeriatric Co-Management on Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures—Real World Data of Comparable Cohorts Originating from the Same Geographic Area

Method Kabelitz, Michael Dietrich, Samuel Känel, Manuel Känel et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hip and Femur Fractures
2.01
article

The Influence of Orthogeriatric Co-Management on Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures—Real World Data of Comparable Cohorts Originating from the Same Geographic Area

Method Kabelitz, Michael Dietrich, Samuel Känel, Manuel Känel, Kim Aggeler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Surgically treated proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients are a major debilitating condition, with continuously rising numbers, impacting patients and the healthcare system. Models of care based on orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) have suggested promising clinical outcomes compared with the standard of care (SOC) model in the treatment of frail elderly patients. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study investigating clinical outcomes in two comparable cohorts of patients aged 75 and older, who underwent surgical treatment for proximal femoral fractures in 2023 was conducted. Included individuals all originated from the same geographic area, therefore presenting a unique cohort. The cohorts were differentiated by the perioperative care protocols implemented: an OGCM protocol (<i>n</i> = 147) versus a SOC protocol (<i>n</i> = 143). The main outcome measures were readmission, revision, and mortality rates at 30 days and one-year post-surgery, as well as the length of hospital stay. <b>Results</b>: Findings revealed a positive impact for patients treated under the OGCM protocol, with a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay (6 vs. 7 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001), while no consistent differences were observed in readmission (36.2% vs. 39.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.676), surgical revision (8.4% vs. 12.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.485), and mortality (24.1% vs. 31.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.781) rates one-year after surgery. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite the absence of significant differences in major outcomes such as mortality, readmission, and surgical revision between the two protocols, the implementation of a more resource-intensive multidisciplinary care pathway resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay. Beyond its clinical value, this improvement may contribute to reducing the burden on healthcare staff and support the sustainability of hospital systems facing increasing pressure.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
ETH Zurich (CH), Stadtspital Waid (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hip and Femur Fractures
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.