Sexual selection and speciation: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Understanding the drivers of biodiversity is a central goal in evolutionary biology. In particular, sexual selection has long been proposed as a potential catalyst of speciation, but empirical evidence remains inconclusive. Here, we present a comprehensive meta-analysis synthesizing 145 effect sizes from 50 comparative studies testing the relationship between proxies of sexual selection and species diversity across the animal kingdom. Our results reveal a modest but consistent positive association (global effect size: <i>r</i> = 0.201; 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.366), supporting the hypothesis that sexual selection contributes to speciation. However, the global effect size corresponds to an <i>R</i> ² of only 0.04, suggesting that sexual selection is not a dominant driver of speciation. We also uncover substantial heterogeneity among effect sizes, largely attributable to between-study variation and taxonomic affinities of effect sizes. Studies that fail to account for phylogenetic non-independence tend to report stronger effects. In contrast, other tested methodological and biological moderators, such as the proxies used to estimate the strength of sexual selection or proxies of speciation, do not explain the observed heterogeneity in effect sizes. Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results, and we find no signatures of publication bias. We highlight the need for broader taxonomic coverage and a greater focus on understudied mechanisms, such as post-copulatory sexual selection, to refine our understanding of the role of sexual selection in shaping species diversity.