Can Chatbots Please Both Patients and Experts? Benchmarking AI and Clinical Guidelines for Hearing Loss

Modern artificial intelligence chatbots can provide clear and generally reliable patient education for hearing loss, but full guideline concordance remains inconsistent. Expert oversight is advised to ensure clinical accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004686
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Chatbots Please Both Patients and Experts? Benchmarking AI and Clinical Guidelines for Hearing Loss

Ben Gvili, Noa Rozendorn, Idit Tessler, David Yogev et al.
2 citations
Otology & Neurotology
Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
3.04
article

Can Chatbots Please Both Patients and Experts? Benchmarking AI and Clinical Guidelines for Hearing Loss

Ben Gvili, Noa Rozendorn, Idit Tessler, David Yogev, Sholem Hack, Amit Wolfowitz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Modern artificial intelligence chatbots can provide clear and generally reliable patient education for hearing loss, but full guideline concordance remains inconsistent. Expert oversight is advised to ensure clinical accuracy.

Otology & NeurotologyVol. 47(1)
University of Nicosia (CY), Sheba Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.