Expertocracy as thin-centered ideology: theoretical concepts and empirical illustrations

The Covid-19 pandemic and looming prospect of climate change have brought a debate on the role of expertise and scientific knowledge in policymaking to the fore. This debate informs the work of many scholars working on the dangers and promises of technocracy. Technocracy, however, is neither the only nor the most important ideology that calls for policymaking based on science, research, scholarship, and expertise. In the wake of the ongoing crisis of democratic regimes, it is the ideology of expertocracy that is most significantly gaining in influence. This paper proposes a conceptualization of expertocracy, while at the same time taking its flexible, promiscuous-by-design character into account and framing it as a thin-centered ideology that needs to be distinguished from technocracy and scientific policy advice. These concepts are then used to analyze the writings of Luisa Neubauer, a leading figure of the German branch of Fridays for Future. This case also helps us to understand why the thin-centered ideology of expertocracy is better adapted than technocracy and scientific policy advice both to the current polarization of democratic political life and to the context of looming climate change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Exchange
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2025.2575772
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expertocracy as thin-centered ideology: theoretical concepts and empirical illustrations

Veith Selk
Political Research Exchange
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Expertocracy as thin-centered ideology: theoretical concepts and empirical illustrations

Veith Selk
article en

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic and looming prospect of climate change have brought a debate on the role of expertise and scientific knowledge in policymaking to the fore. This debate informs the work of many scholars working on the dangers and promises of technocracy. Technocracy, however, is neither the only nor the most important ideology that calls for policymaking based on science, research, scholarship, and expertise. In the wake of the ongoing crisis of democratic regimes, it is the ideology of expertocracy that is most significantly gaining in influence. This paper proposes a conceptualization of expertocracy, while at the same time taking its flexible, promiscuous-by-design character into account and framing it as a thin-centered ideology that needs to be distinguished from technocracy and scientific policy advice. These concepts are then used to analyze the writings of Luisa Neubauer, a leading figure of the German branch of Fridays for Future. This case also helps us to understand why the thin-centered ideology of expertocracy is better adapted than technocracy and scientific policy advice both to the current polarization of democratic political life and to the context of looming climate change.

Political Research ExchangeVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.