Cyber Surveillance and the Freedom of Speech: Evaluating Pakistan’s PECA 2016 and the UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 under Human Rights Standards

In an unprecedented manner, this research critically assesses cyber-surveillance and freedom of expression, contrasting Pakistan's Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016 with the United Kingdom's Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) 2016. In both jurisdictions, the extent to which national security priorities compete with the human rights of Free Speech and expression is explored through the relevant legal frameworks. The inquiry touches upon whether these surveillance practices meet international human-rights standards while zooming in on legal vagueness, surveillance issues, and lack of accountability. Therefore, it concludes that strong safeguards and a transparent regulatory mechanism must be urgently put in place to counter the abuse of such powers while fostering fundamental freedoms in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Sociological Review
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2025(x-iii).12
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cyber Surveillance and the Freedom of Speech: Evaluating Pakistan’s PECA 2016 and the UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 under Human Rights Standards

Naveed Ejaz
Global Sociological Review
Ombudsman and Human Rights
article

Cyber Surveillance and the Freedom of Speech: Evaluating Pakistan’s PECA 2016 and the UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 under Human Rights Standards

Naveed Ejaz
article en

Abstract

In an unprecedented manner, this research critically assesses cyber-surveillance and freedom of expression, contrasting Pakistan's Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016 with the United Kingdom's Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) 2016. In both jurisdictions, the extent to which national security priorities compete with the human rights of Free Speech and expression is explored through the relevant legal frameworks. The inquiry touches upon whether these surveillance practices meet international human-rights standards while zooming in on legal vagueness, surveillance issues, and lack of accountability. Therefore, it concludes that strong safeguards and a transparent regulatory mechanism must be urgently put in place to counter the abuse of such powers while fostering fundamental freedoms in the digital age.

Global Sociological ReviewVol. X(III)
Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.