A ‘Self-Made’ Billionaire? Gender and the Myth of Meritocratic Wealth

This research note critically examines the concept of ‘self-made’ wealth, drawing on data from the Forbes 400 rich list (2014–2023). The ‘self-made’ narrative, we argue, obscures structural factors that shape wealth accumulation and serves meritocratic discourses that justify wealth inequality. Our empirical analysis reveals that men are disproportionately labelled as self-made, while women are more frequently labelled as heirs. We argue that this reflects a persistent gender ideology that fails to recognize women’s contributions to wealth creation. We propose using new categories like ‘dynastic’ and ‘non-dynastic’ to shift the focus to family-based wealth dynamics; we also compare how men and women on the Forbes 400 rich list from 2023 would be labelled using those terms. Additionally, we highlight the usefulness of non-binary concepts like upward mobility or the big jump . Such reconceptualization, we argue, offers a more nuanced understanding of the formation of the wealth elite.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251380755
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A ‘Self-Made’ Billionaire? Gender and the Myth of Meritocratic Wealth

Karen Lillie, Daria Tisch
1 citations
Sociology
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
article

A ‘Self-Made’ Billionaire? Gender and the Myth of Meritocratic Wealth

Karen Lillie, Daria Tisch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research note critically examines the concept of ‘self-made’ wealth, drawing on data from the Forbes 400 rich list (2014–2023). The ‘self-made’ narrative, we argue, obscures structural factors that shape wealth accumulation and serves meritocratic discourses that justify wealth inequality. Our empirical analysis reveals that men are disproportionately labelled as self-made, while women are more frequently labelled as heirs. We argue that this reflects a persistent gender ideology that fails to recognize women’s contributions to wealth creation. We propose using new categories like ‘dynastic’ and ‘non-dynastic’ to shift the focus to family-based wealth dynamics; we also compare how men and women on the Forbes 400 rich list from 2023 would be labelled using those terms. Additionally, we highlight the usefulness of non-binary concepts like upward mobility or the big jump . Such reconceptualization, we argue, offers a more nuanced understanding of the formation of the wealth elite.

SociologyVol. 60(1)
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A ‘Self-Made’ Billionaire? Gender and the Myth of Meritocratic Wealth — Karen Lillie, Daria Tisch · Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS