Analysis of Correction Factor Differences in Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Systems: Comparison Between Platform-Only and Fully Coupled Models

Floating offshore wind turbine systems are increasingly being used in deep-sea environments, where accurate predictions of platform motion responses are essential for safe and efficient design. This study evaluated the applicability of correction factors derived from simplified platform-only models when applied to more complex fully coupled models that include tower and turbine components. Computational fluid dynamics analysis was performed using STAR-CCM+ to quantify the viscous effects, and potential flow simulations were conducted using OrcaFlex for the platform-only and fully coupled conditions. One hundred and twenty-eight simulations were carried out by varying the combinations of drag coefficients in three motion modes: surge, heave, and pitch. The results showed that correction factors based on the fully coupled model provided the highest accuracy across all modes. On the other hand, those derived from platform-only models also showed acceptable performance in surge and heave motions, with less than 10 % deviations. The pitch response showed greater sensitivity to the drag coefficients, revealing limitations in using simplified models for fully coupled conditions. This study provides a quantitative basis for evaluating the transferability of correction factors between different modeling approaches, contributing to the practical application and generalization of correction factor use in floating platform motion analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26748/ksoe.2025.017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Correction Factor Differences in Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Systems: Comparison Between Platform-Only and Fully Coupled Models

Ho-Seong Yang, Ali Alkhabbaz, Young‐Ho Lee
1 citations
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
1.15
article

Analysis of Correction Factor Differences in Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Systems: Comparison Between Platform-Only and Fully Coupled Models

Ho-Seong Yang, Ali Alkhabbaz, Young‐Ho Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Floating offshore wind turbine systems are increasingly being used in deep-sea environments, where accurate predictions of platform motion responses are essential for safe and efficient design. This study evaluated the applicability of correction factors derived from simplified platform-only models when applied to more complex fully coupled models that include tower and turbine components. Computational fluid dynamics analysis was performed using STAR-CCM+ to quantify the viscous effects, and potential flow simulations were conducted using OrcaFlex for the platform-only and fully coupled conditions. One hundred and twenty-eight simulations were carried out by varying the combinations of drag coefficients in three motion modes: surge, heave, and pitch. The results showed that correction factors based on the fully coupled model provided the highest accuracy across all modes. On the other hand, those derived from platform-only models also showed acceptable performance in surge and heave motions, with less than 10 % deviations. The pitch response showed greater sensitivity to the drag coefficients, revealing limitations in using simplified models for fully coupled conditions. This study provides a quantitative basis for evaluating the transferability of correction factors between different modeling approaches, contributing to the practical application and generalization of correction factor use in floating platform motion analysis.

Journal of Ocean Engineering and TechnologyVol. 39(5)
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Wave and Wind Energy Systems
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.