Low carbon policies and the systemic risk of mutual funds — the case of the “double carbon” target in China

We construct a systemic risk measurement model for funds based on the common asset holding association and fire-sale mechanism. We analyze the impact of low-carbon policies on the systemic risk of funds, and the results indicate that the “double carbon” target would have an impact on the systemic risk of funds. There are significant differences in the impact of different carbon reduction paths of the “double carbon” target on the systemic risk of funds. The impact of the energy system transition on the systemic risk of the fund is greater than that of the CCS deployment. Furthermore, our findings indicate that funds that implement brown and green investment strategies would experience different outcomes when the “double carbon” target is implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05996-1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low carbon policies and the systemic risk of mutual funds — the case of the “double carbon” target in China

Shihua Bao, Shuyang Jiang, Hu Wang
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Low carbon policies and the systemic risk of mutual funds — the case of the “double carbon” target in China

Shihua Bao, Shuyang Jiang, Hu Wang
article en

Abstract

We construct a systemic risk measurement model for funds based on the common asset holding association and fire-sale mechanism. We analyze the impact of low-carbon policies on the systemic risk of funds, and the results indicate that the “double carbon” target would have an impact on the systemic risk of funds. There are significant differences in the impact of different carbon reduction paths of the “double carbon” target on the systemic risk of funds. The impact of the energy system transition on the systemic risk of the fund is greater than that of the CCS deployment. Furthermore, our findings indicate that funds that implement brown and green investment strategies would experience different outcomes when the “double carbon” target is implemented.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
Government of Jiangsu Province, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.