Prognostic factors and outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib: a retrospective database study

<h3>Background</h3> The purpose of this study was to describe patient profiles and real-world outcomes and identify prognostic factors among patients with common epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>)–mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) osimertinib. <h3>Patients and methods</h3> This retrospective study used data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME; France), Rigshospitalet/Herlev Hospital (RH; Denmark), and National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS; UK) databases. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), time to next therapy (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Prognostic factors for outcomes were identified using univariate and multivariable proportional hazards regression. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 1646 patients were included (ESME, <i>n</i> = 624; RH, <i>n</i> = 133; NCRAS, <i>n</i> = 889). For patients receiving 1L osimertinib, median PFS, TTD, TTNT, and OS were 11.9, 15.0, 18.8, and 24.8 months, respectively. Corresponding values for 2L osimertinib were 7.4, 10.0, 11.9, and 17.1 months. Although distinct prognostic factors were identified for different outcomes and lines of treatment, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, presence of exon 21 L858R substitutions, and liver metastases were consistently associated with poorer outcomes across all endpoints. Of 771 patients receiving 1L osimertinib, at least 38% died before initiating a 2L treatment; 41% of patients receiving 2L osimertinib (<i>n</i> = 875) died before initiating a third-line treatment. The most common subsequent therapy was chemotherapy [1L osimertinib, 47% (97/208); 2L osimertinib, 52% (193/368)]. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This retrospective real-world analysis highlights the unmet need for more effective treatment options in common <i>EGFR</i>-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmorw.2025.100197
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic factors and outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib: a retrospective database study

Joris Diels, C. Chouaïd, C. Knott, J. Edwards et al.
ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Prognostic factors and outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib: a retrospective database study

Joris Diels, C. Chouaïd, C. Knott, J. Edwards, Andreas Bjerrum, Pauline Macouillard, M. Pérol, J. Penton, L. Bosquet, Sophie José, Irene Luccarini, N.J. Perualila, Jan Sermon
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> The purpose of this study was to describe patient profiles and real-world outcomes and identify prognostic factors among patients with common epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>)–mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) osimertinib. <h3>Patients and methods</h3> This retrospective study used data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME; France), Rigshospitalet/Herlev Hospital (RH; Denmark), and National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS; UK) databases. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), time to next therapy (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Prognostic factors for outcomes were identified using univariate and multivariable proportional hazards regression. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 1646 patients were included (ESME, <i>n</i> = 624; RH, <i>n</i> = 133; NCRAS, <i>n</i> = 889). For patients receiving 1L osimertinib, median PFS, TTD, TTNT, and OS were 11.9, 15.0, 18.8, and 24.8 months, respectively. Corresponding values for 2L osimertinib were 7.4, 10.0, 11.9, and 17.1 months. Although distinct prognostic factors were identified for different outcomes and lines of treatment, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, presence of exon 21 L858R substitutions, and liver metastases were consistently associated with poorer outcomes across all endpoints. Of 771 patients receiving 1L osimertinib, at least 38% died before initiating a 2L treatment; 41% of patients receiving 2L osimertinib (<i>n</i> = 875) died before initiating a third-line treatment. The most common subsequent therapy was chemotherapy [1L osimertinib, 47% (97/208); 2L osimertinib, 52% (193/368)]. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This retrospective real-world analysis highlights the unmet need for more effective treatment options in common <i>EGFR</i>-mutated advanced NSCLC.

ESMO Real World Data and Digital OncologyVol. 10
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (FR), Johnson & Johnson (Italy) (IT), Johnson & Johnson (United Kingdom) (GB), UniCancer Group (FR), Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil (FR), NHS England
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Herlev Hospital, Eisai, Rigshospitalet, Unicancer, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.