Biochar and Compost as Sustainable Alternatives to Peat

The increasing demand for sustainable substrates in agriculture and urban greening calls for alternatives to peat, whose extraction poses significant environmental risks. This study assesses the potential of olive pomace biochar (OB), wood biochar (WB), and green compost (GC), alone or in combination, to partially replace peat in growing media and improve substrate properties and plant development. Ten different substrates were formulated by substituting 10–20% of a commercial peat-based substrate with these organic amendments, using the commercial substrate alone as a control. The effects of such replacements were evaluated in the following experiments: a germination test conducted in Petri dishes using four forage species (Medicago polymorpha, Lolium perenne, Festuca arundinacea, and Lolium rigidum); and two parallel pot experiments lasting 100 days each (one with M. polymorpha and L. perenne, and another with young Olea Europaea var. Arbequina saplings). This study evaluated the impact on plant development, as well as the physical properties and composition of the substrates during the incubation process. Germination and survival of forage species were comparable or improved in most treatments, except those including 20% OB, which consistently reduced germination—likely due to high electrical conductivity (>10dS/m). In the pot experiments, substrate pH and total carbon content increased significantly with biochar addition, particularly with 20% WB, which doubled total C relative to control. Both forage species (Medicago polymorpha and Lolium perenne) and the olive saplings (Olea Europaea) exhibited normal growth, with no significant differences in biomass, water content, or physiological stress indicators when compared to the control group. Nutrient uptake was found to be stable across treatments, although magnesium levels were below sufficiency thresholds without triggering visible deficiency symptoms. Overall, combining compost and biochar—particularly WB and GC—proved to be a viable strategy to reduce peat use while maintaining substrate quality and supporting robust plant growth. This approach proved effective across the different plant varieties tested, including Medicago polymorpha, Lolium perenne, and young olive plants, which together encompass a wide spectrum of agronomic and horticultural applications as well as contrasting growth and nutrient requirements. Adverse effects on early plant development can be avoided by carefully selecting and characterizing biochars, with specific attention to salinity and C/N ratio. This finding is crucial for the successful large-scale implementation of sustainable alternatives to peat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112455
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biochar and Compost as Sustainable Alternatives to Peat

Arturo Santa-Olalla, Paloma Campos, José M. de la Rosa Arranz, Miguel A. Rosales et al.
1 citations
Agronomy
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
article

Biochar and Compost as Sustainable Alternatives to Peat

Arturo Santa-Olalla, Paloma Campos, José M. de la Rosa Arranz, Miguel A. Rosales, Águeda Sánchez-Martín, Marta Lucas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable substrates in agriculture and urban greening calls for alternatives to peat, whose extraction poses significant environmental risks. This study assesses the potential of olive pomace biochar (OB), wood biochar (WB), and green compost (GC), alone or in combination, to partially replace peat in growing media and improve substrate properties and plant development. Ten different substrates were formulated by substituting 10–20% of a commercial peat-based substrate with these organic amendments, using the commercial substrate alone as a control. The effects of such replacements were evaluated in the following experiments: a germination test conducted in Petri dishes using four forage species (Medicago polymorpha, Lolium perenne, Festuca arundinacea, and Lolium rigidum); and two parallel pot experiments lasting 100 days each (one with M. polymorpha and L. perenne, and another with young Olea Europaea var. Arbequina saplings). This study evaluated the impact on plant development, as well as the physical properties and composition of the substrates during the incubation process. Germination and survival of forage species were comparable or improved in most treatments, except those including 20% OB, which consistently reduced germination—likely due to high electrical conductivity (>10dS/m). In the pot experiments, substrate pH and total carbon content increased significantly with biochar addition, particularly with 20% WB, which doubled total C relative to control. Both forage species (Medicago polymorpha and Lolium perenne) and the olive saplings (Olea Europaea) exhibited normal growth, with no significant differences in biomass, water content, or physiological stress indicators when compared to the control group. Nutrient uptake was found to be stable across treatments, although magnesium levels were below sufficiency thresholds without triggering visible deficiency symptoms. Overall, combining compost and biochar—particularly WB and GC—proved to be a viable strategy to reduce peat use while maintaining substrate quality and supporting robust plant growth. This approach proved effective across the different plant varieties tested, including Medicago polymorpha, Lolium perenne, and young olive plants, which together encompass a wide spectrum of agronomic and horticultural applications as well as contrasting growth and nutrient requirements. Adverse effects on early plant development can be avoided by carefully selecting and characterizing biochars, with specific attention to salinity and C/N ratio. This finding is crucial for the successful large-scale implementation of sustainable alternatives to peat.

AgronomyVol. 15(11)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Estación Experimental del Zaidín (ES), Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (ES), Instituto Nacional de la Salud (ES)
Fundación BBVA, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.