Systemic risk in the fintech-banking system: Assessing instabilities and vulnerabilities in Central Europe

Systemic risk in banking has drawn worldwide attention since the 2007–2009 crisis. Fintech startups provide cutting-edge solutions that extend beyond banks’ traditional capabilities, fostering intensive bank–fintech cooperation and giving rise to a ‘pervaded banking system’ (PBS) with novel, largely uncharted vulnerabilities. Using complex adaptive systems theory, we assemble a dataset of 604 fintechs and 802 banks in the Central Europe (DACH-Region – Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) – and propose a structurally defined stability concept. We evaluate PBS stability through multiple network-based stress-testing scenarios. The results show that large-scale fintech failures can trigger severe systemic disruptions, whereas exits of small and recently established fintechs have limited effects. By contrast, fintech firms occupying structurally exposed positions act as key risk amplifiers, a channel that traditional risk assessments largely overlook. Our framework thus complements conventional market- or balance-sheet-based approaches by uncovering structure-induced vulnerabilities into the financial system. • Assess the impact of diverse fintech firms on banking system stability and interconnectedness. • Financial regulation: Inform policymakers on extending regulations to reduce overall banking system risk. • Utilize complex systems to analyse risks posed by different types of fintech. • Highlight risk awareness for bank managers in fintech collaboration agreements. • Provide strategic insights for fintech managers within the banking-fintech ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2025.102071
Citations
2
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic risk in the fintech-banking system: Assessing instabilities and vulnerabilities in Central Europe

Roland von Horn, Muhamed Kudic
2 citations
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
article

Systemic risk in the fintech-banking system: Assessing instabilities and vulnerabilities in Central Europe

Roland von Horn, Muhamed Kudic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Systemic risk in banking has drawn worldwide attention since the 2007–2009 crisis. Fintech startups provide cutting-edge solutions that extend beyond banks’ traditional capabilities, fostering intensive bank–fintech cooperation and giving rise to a ‘pervaded banking system’ (PBS) with novel, largely uncharted vulnerabilities. Using complex adaptive systems theory, we assemble a dataset of 604 fintechs and 802 banks in the Central Europe (DACH-Region – Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) – and propose a structurally defined stability concept. We evaluate PBS stability through multiple network-based stress-testing scenarios. The results show that large-scale fintech failures can trigger severe systemic disruptions, whereas exits of small and recently established fintechs have limited effects. By contrast, fintech firms occupying structurally exposed positions act as key risk amplifiers, a channel that traditional risk assessments largely overlook. Our framework thus complements conventional market- or balance-sheet-based approaches by uncovering structure-induced vulnerabilities into the financial system. • Assess the impact of diverse fintech firms on banking system stability and interconnectedness. • Financial regulation: Inform policymakers on extending regulations to reduce overall banking system risk. • Utilize complex systems to analyse risks posed by different types of fintech. • Highlight risk awareness for bank managers in fintech collaboration agreements. • Provide strategic insights for fintech managers within the banking-fintech ecosystem.

The Quarterly Review of Economics and FinanceVol. 104
Hochschule Bremen (DE), Ostwestfalen-Lippe University of Applied Sciences and Arts (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.